Search Results

You searched for:
Label: HRH

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    HRH. Knowles, D., C. N. L. Brooke, and V. London, ed., The Heads of Religious Houses in England and Wales 940–1216 (Cambridge, 1972). 226 charters cited.

    • S 391. Comments, dubious, but subscriptions consistent, p. 235
    • S 534. Comments, no grounds for suspicion, p. 229
    • S 544. Comments, genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 229
    • S 546. Comments, has been supposed a forgery, subscriptions are consistent, p. 229
    • S 556. Comments, probably authentic, p. 229
    • S 557. Comments, genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 229
    • S 586. Comments, possibly genuine but doubtful, subscriptions are consistent with 958 x 959, p. 229
    • S 597. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 229
    • S 605. Comments, subscriptions consistent, p. 229
    • S 607. Comments, doubtful, but subscriptions are consistent, p. 229
    • S 625. Comments, ? interpolated, subscriptions are possible but only 3 survive, p. 229
    • S 658. Comments, doubtful, p. 229
    • S 660. Comments, doubtful in form, subscriptions consistent but not numerous, p. 229
    • S 668. Comments, possibly genuine, subscriptions consistent with 964 x 974, p. 230
    • S 673. Comments, doubtful, p. 229
    • S 675. Comments, p. 229, ? genuine, but subscriptions doubtful
    • S 708. Comments, ? genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 717. Comments, authentic, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 719. Comments, ? genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 725. Comments, ? suspicious, subscriptions consistent if Ælfthryth was queen in 964
    • S 729. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions probably consistent for 964 x 970, p. 237 and n. 1
    • S 731. Comments, controversial but agreed to be spurious in present form, subscriptions are probably consistent, p. 230
    • S 734. Comments, subscriptions consistent but relatively few, p. 230
    • S 735. Comments, ? genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 737. Comments, subscriptions consistent, p. 230
    • S 738. Comments, original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 739. Comments, ? genuine, subscriptions are consistent but not numerous, p. 230
    • S 741. Comments, spurious, but subscriptions consistent, p. 230
    • S 745. Comments, original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 749. Comments, probably genuine and to be dated 972, subscriptions consistent with 972 x 974, p. 230
    • S 766. Comments, subscriptions consistent, possibly authentic, p. 237
    • S 767. Comments, ? genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 774. Comments, spurious, subscriptions inconsistent, p. 230
    • S 777. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 779. Comments, probably spurious, subscriptions consistent except for Bishop Ælric, p. 230
    • S 780. Comments, probably authentic, subscriptions consistent, p. 230
    • S 781. Comments, probably authentic, subscriptions are consistent, p. 230
    • S 786. Comments, MS 1 very early copy but suspicious, subscriptions would be consistent if Kinsige = Wynsige, bishop of Lichfield, p. 230
    • S 788. Comments, spurious, subscriptions identical with S 786 to end of duces, p. 231
    • S 794. Comments, genuine, p. 231
    • S 795. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 796. Comments, doubtful although the subscriptions are consistent, apart from the three Æthelwolds (? a scribal error), p. 231
    • S 799. Comments, ? spurious, p. 231
    • S 800. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 801. Comments, early copy, almost certainly genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 802. Comments, subscriptions possible for 975, except Sigeric, abbot of St Augustine's, p. 231
    • S 804. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions consistent but few, p. 231
    • S 805. Comments, subscriptions consistent, dates 970 x 972, p. 231
    • S 806. Comments, probably authentic base, subscriptions doubtful, p. 235
    • S 807. Comments, has been doubted, but subscriptions consistent, dates 968 x 974, p. 231
    • S 812. Comments, suspicious, no subscriptions, p. 230
    • S 813. Comments, subscriptions spurious, p. 235
    • S 829. Comments, subscriptions not numerous, consistent with 975 x 978, p. 234
    • S 834. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions consistent, p. 231
    • S 835. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 837. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 838. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 839. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 840. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 841. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 843. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 848. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 855. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 856. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 858. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 860. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 861. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 864. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 865. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 868. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 869. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 870. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 872. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 231
    • S 874. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 876. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent but raise certain difficulties, p. 232
    • S 877. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, dates 989 x 990, p. 236
    • S 879. Comments, subscriptions consistent for 996, p. 237
    • S 880. Comments, original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 881. Comments, probably genuine basis at least, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 883. Comments, probably authentic, subscriptions are consistent, dates 992 x 995 (probably 994), p. 234
    • S 886. Comments, genuine, p. 232
    • S 887. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 888. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 890. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, diploma probably original, p. 237
    • S 891. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232 (citing wrong S no.)
    • S 893. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 895. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, otherwise dubious, p. 232
    • S 898. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, probably original, p. 232
    • S 899. Comments, subscriptions corrupt but not unrecognizable, probably basically authentic, p. 232
    • S 900. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 901. Comments, subscriptions almost consistent, but two bishops of Dorchester sign, p. 235
    • S 903. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 904. Comments, subscriptions are consistent in MS 1, p. 232
    • S 906. Comments, MS 1 not original but charter possibly genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 910. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, charter probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 911. Comments, probably authentic, subscriptions are consistent, p. 232
    • S 914. Comments, ? for 1002, probably spurious, p. 232
    • S 915. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 918. Comments, subscriptions probably consistent, p. 235
    • S 920. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 921. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 926. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, probably authentic, p. 232
    • S 927. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, except perhaps for Bishop Lyfing, p. 235
    • S 930. Comments, subscriptions mostly consistent but last two bishops impossible and perhaps added, p. 237
    • S 931. Comments, subscriptions difficult, but probably a genuine base, p. 235
    • S 933. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 939. Comments, genuine, subscriptions few but consistent, p. 236
    • S 942. Comments, dates 990 x 991, subscriptions are consistent, no grounds for suspicion, p. 232
    • S 950. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 951. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, but charter is probably not authentic, p. 232
    • S 953. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, but 'original' a forgery, p. 237
    • S 954. Comments, spurious, although subscriptions are mainly consistent, p. 233
    • S 955. Comments, subscriptions are doubtful, p. 233
    • S 956. Comments, probably original, p. 237
    • S 957. Comments, spurious, but subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 958. Comments, subscriptions seem consistent but authenticity is not certain, p. 233
    • S 959. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, charter has at least an authentic base, p. 236
    • S 960. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 961. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 962. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions are consistent with 1027, the date of Bishop Lyfing's appointment, p. 233
    • S 963. Comments, probably original, although it confuses Canterbury and York, subscriptions otherwise consistent, p. 233
    • S 964. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 965. Comments, spurious, p. 233
    • S 967. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 969. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions nearly consistent, p. 235
    • S 971. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 973. Comments, if not genuine, represents Abingdon tradition, p. 237
    • S 974. Comments, seems to be original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 975. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 235
    • S 977. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 979. Comments, subscriptions few but probably consistent, dates 1024 x 1032, p. 235
    • S 980. Comments, dubious, dates 1022 x 1023, p. 233
    • S 993. Comments, dubious, but subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 994. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 999. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1000. Comments, spurious, subscriptions are corrupt and probably inconsistent, p. 234
    • S 1002. Comments, spurious, subscriptions not consistent, p. 233
    • S 1003. Comments, possibly genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 1004. Comments, doubtful, a supposed original but subscriptions are inconsistent, p. 233
    • S 1006. Comments, possibly genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1008. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1010. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1011. Comments, spurious, but subscriptions are probably consistent, p. 233
    • S 1012. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1014. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1015. Comments, probably genuine, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 1017. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 1019. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1020. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, apart from Abbot Ordric of Abingdon, p. 234 and n. 1
    • S 1021. Comments, probably original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234 and n. 1
    • S 1022. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234 and n. 1
    • S 1023. Comments, subscriptions probably consistent, p. 234 and n. 1
    • S 1025. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions are consistent with 1049 x 1050, p. 234
    • S 1027. Comments, subscriptions are consistent with 1058, p. 237
    • S 1033. Comments, probably authentic basis, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1034. Comments, probably authentic basis, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1035. Comments, spurious, p. 234
    • S 1036. Comments, spurious, subscriptions are not consistent, p. 234
    • S 1037a. Comments, spurious, but witness-list possible for c. 1062 or a little earlier, pp. 81, 234
    • S 1038. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions are few but not definitely inconsistent, p. 234
    • S 1041. Comments, spurious, but subscriptions are nearly consistent, p. 234
    • S 1043. Comments, spurious, but subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1044. Comments, possibly original, subscriptions are consistent, p. 233
    • S 1049. Comments, spurious, p. 234
    • S 1055. Comments, probably spurious, but subscriptions are consistent with 1047, apart from the abbot of Evesham, p. 233
    • S 1057. Comments, spurious, subscriptions are not consistent, dates ? 1044 x 1058, p. 234
    • S 1058. Comments, dubious, but subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1110. Comments, spurious, p. 236
    • S 1163. Comments, authentic, p. 236
    • S 1215. Comments, original, subscriptions are consistent but very few can be checked, p. 230
    • S 1218. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, p. 237
    • S 1220. Comments, possibly original, p. 236
    • S 1226. Comments, spurious, subscriptions are few but probably consistent, p. 234
    • S 1230. Comments, spurious, p. 234
    • S 1234. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1294. Comments, spurious, subscriptions are not consistent, p. 230
    • S 1321. Comments, early copy but doubtful, no subscriptions, p. 230
    • S 1329. Comments, doubtful, no subscriptions but early copy, p. 231
    • S 1332. Comments, probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 1353. Comments, probably genuine, p. 231
    • S 1354. Comments, probably genuine, p. 231
    • S 1362. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1363. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1364. Comments, probably genuine, p. 232
    • S 1365. Comments, probably genuine, p. 232
    • S 1366. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1369. Comments, probably genuine, dates 983 x 985, p. 235
    • S 1372. Comments, probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 1373. Comments, probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 1374. Comments, probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 1380. Comments, doubtful, but probably has a genuine base, p. 238
    • S 1381. Comments, probably authentic, p. 232
    • S 1384. Comments, subscriptions consistent but few, probably genuine, p. 235
    • S 1388. Comments, probably genuine, p. 232
    • S 1394. Comments, probably original, p. 236
    • S 1396. Comments, subscriptions are consistent, dates 1041 x 1042, p. 233
    • S 1397. Comments, no obviously objectionable features, p. 233
    • S 1403. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1405. Comments, probably original, p. 238
    • S 1406. Comments, probably genuine, dates 1046 x 1056 (? 1051 x 1052), p. 236
    • S 1407. Comments, probably original, dates c. 1053, p. 238
    • S 1420. Comments, subscriptions few but consistent, p. 236
    • S 1422. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1423. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1424. Comments, doubtful, p. 235
    • S 1426. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1449. Comments, probably genuine, if Eadgifu is indeed Edgar's daughter then the charter must be dated c. 975, pp. 223, 235
    • S 1452. Comments, Leofric abbot of Exeter probably genuine, pp. 48 n. 2, 211, 235
    • S 1454. Comments, probably original, p. 236
    • S 1456. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1459. Comments, authentic, dates c. 1014 x 1016, p. 236
    • S 1461. Comments, authentic, p. 236
    • S 1465. Comments, presumably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1468. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1471. Comments, probably original, dates it 1045 x 1047, p. 236
    • S 1473. Comments, probably original, p. 236
    • S 1474. Comments, probably genuine, p. 236
    • S 1475. Comments, subscriptions consistent but not numerous, charter doubtful., p. 234
    • S 1476. Comments, very likely an early forgery, but possibly genuine, p. 236
    • S 1478. Comments, authentic, p. 236
    • S 1479. Comments, dubious, subscriptions are few but seem consistent, p. 234
    • S 1480. Comments, doubtful, subscriptions are consistent, p. 234
    • S 1488. Comments, genuine, dates 1002 x 1005 (probably 1003 x 1004), p. 236
    • S 1495. Comments, ? c. 1004 x 1014, probably basically genuine, though subscriptions are inconsistent, p. 236
    • S 1506. Comments, probably original, probably from 958, p. 235
    • S 1531. Comments, genuine, p. 236