Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Hart, ECNE

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Hart, ECNE. Hart, C., The Early Charters of Northern England and the North Midlands (Leicester, 1975). 220 charters cited.

    • S 64. Comments, authentic basis, no. 42
    • S 68. Comments, post-Conquest forgery, no. 1 (pp. 55, 67, 111, 117)
    • S 72. Comments, spurious, no. 33
    • S 76. Comments, authentic, no. 41
    • S 81. Comments, forged at Evesham c. 1097 x 1104, cf. p. 63, no. 44
    • S 94. Comments, authentic, no. 46
    • S 120. Comments, authentic, Eanburh perhaps abbess of Bath; Fæhha leage is the Fachanlea of S 1310 and the Faccanlea of S 1318, located in the vicinity of Teddington, no. 48, p. 81
    • S 179. Comments, corrects Finberg's discussion of bounds of Hawling, p. 382
    • S 191. Comments, authentic basis, no. 49
    • S 197. Comments, authentic, Stanlege may be Stanley, Derbys, no. 34
    • S 198. Comments, authentic, no. 50
    • S 201. Comments, forgery, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 224. Comments, authentic, suggests Stantun may be Stanton in the Peak, Derbys, no. 100 and p. 167
    • S 245. Comments, discusses dating problems, p. 383
    • S 258. Comments, diplomatic identical with that of S 259, and the bounds with those of S 565, p. 382
    • S 304. Comments, p. 382
    • S 349. Comments, p. 385
    • S 392. Comments, spurious, suggests identification with Church Eaton, Staffs, no. 81
    • S 395. Comments, authentic, no. 80
    • S 397. Comments, authentic, may be Worcester formulation, no. 101 and p. 167
    • S 401. Comments, reference to St Mary's an anachronism, p. 381
    • S 407. Comments, authentic basis, no. 119
    • S 414. Comments, dates 937 x 939, pp. 381, 383
    • S 418. Comments, notes minor interpolation, p. 382
    • S 451. Comments, unlikely to have been authentic, no. 120a
    • S 465. Comments, original or early copy extant in Winchester in 1643, p. 382
    • S 479. Comments, authentic, no. 82 and p. 167
    • S 484. Comments, authentic, no. 83 (pp. 92, 104) and cf. p. 168
    • S 485. Comments, on witnesses, p. 384
    • S 495. Comments, MS 1 perhaps a contemporary copy, no. 2
    • S 502. Comments, some of the landmarks recur in S 764, p. 384
    • S 507. Comments, appears to be a late forgery based on an authentic chancery text, bounds certainly pre-Conquest, p. 385
    • S 520. Comments, authentic, no. 3
    • S 537. Comments, probably a late forgery, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 545. Comments, probably a post-Conquest forgery, suggests connection with Church Eaton, Staffs, no. 84
    • S 548. Comments, authentic, no. 104
    • S 549. Comments, authentic, tentatively identifies as Sutton-on-the-Hill, Derbys, no. 103
    • S 554. Comments, authentic, p. 168 (no. xii)
    • S 555. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B'; cf. GL 79 (S 1737), pp. 19-22, 384
    • S 557. Comments, authentic, cf. S 556, no. 85 and p. 168
    • S 560. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 561. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 562. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 563. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 564. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 568. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 569. Comments, authentic, no 105 and p. 169
    • S 570. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 574. Comments, authentic charter of Eadwig which has been tampered with, perhaps drawn up by Abingdon scribe, accepts Ekwall's identifications, no. 87
    • S 576. Comments, authentic basis, Eadred's name substituted for Edgar's, no. 54 and p. 169
    • S 579. Comments, authentic basis, witnesses belong to Edgar's reign, p. 381
    • S 588. Comments, authentic, no. 53
    • S 592. Comments, authentic, no. 5
    • S 599. Comments, authentic, estate unidentified, p. 169 (no. xvi)
    • S 602. Comments, authentic, MS 1 contemporary copy, discusses bounds, no. 86 and pp. 174-9
    • S 615. Comments, authentic, no. 6
    • S 623. Comments, reservations about authenticity, MS 1 perhaps a slightly later copy, possibly written by an Abingdon scribe, no. 4 and p. 169
    • S 628. Comments, authentic; on beneficiary's name, no. 106 and pp. 169, 347
    • S 659. Comments, authentic basis, date and error, indiction points to 956, no. 114
    • S 662a. Comments, redates 955 x 957, p. 382
    • S 667. Comments, authentic, no. 121
    • S 676. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 678. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 679. Comments, authentic, no. 115
    • S 681. Comments, authentic, with discussion of bounds, no. 122
    • S 692. Comments, survey refers to an area in Wellow, pp. 383-4
    • S 707. Comments, authentic, p. 169 (no. xix)
    • S 712. Comments, authentic, no. 123
    • S 716. Comments, authentic but corrupt, discusses bounds, no. 124
    • S 720. Comments, authentic, suggests Duddestone, no. 57
    • S 726. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he terms 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 735. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 739. Comments, authentic, no. 107 and p. 169
    • S 743. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 749. Comments, authentic but misdated, should be 974, no. 37 and p. 169
    • S 750. Comments, discusses charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 768. Comments, MS 1 contemporary, beneficiary probably bishop of Dorchester, no. 108 and pp. 181-6
    • S 772. Comments, argues against proposed Worcester links of scribe of MS 1, p. 82
    • S 773. Comments, authentic, no. 62
    • S 780. Comments, p. 385
    • S 785. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 787. Comments, spurious, no. 8
    • S 790. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 791. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 792. Comments, some passages repeated n S 911, p. 386
    • S 798. Comments, spurious, no. 9
    • S 801. Comments, original, discusses identification and bounds, no. 88
    • S 802. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 803. Comments, on charter-type, which he labels 'Dunstan B', pp. 19-22
    • S 807. Comments, dates 970, p. 382
    • S 808. Comments, late forgery, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 828. Comments, very doubtful authenticity, p. 27 n. 1
    • S 830. Comments, probably written at Crediton, not clear if authentic in present form, discusses endorsement, pp. 26-7 n. 4
    • S 831. Comments, impeccable witness-list, p. 27 n. 1
    • S 832. Comments, written at Crediton, not clear if authentic in present form, discusses endorsement, pp. 26-7 n. 4
    • S 834. Comments, resembles S 793, p. 27 n. 5
    • S 835. Comments, on a formula, p. 29 n. 5
    • S 838. Comments, authentic, Winchester formulation, p. 29
    • S 839. Comments, note on formulation, p. 215
    • S 841. Comments, cf. S 714; Winchester formulation, very doubtful text, pp. 27 n. 5, 29 nn. 1 & 5
    • S 844. Comments, closely linked with S 855, pp. 28-9 n. 4
    • S 849. Comments, on formulation, pp. 29 n. 5, 69
    • S 850. Comments, Winchester formulation, p. 29 n. 2
    • S 852. Comments, may have been drawn up at Winchester, pp. 27-8 n. 5, 28-9 n. 4
    • S 853. Comments, incomplete copy of authentic charter, pp. 189-92
    • S 854. Comments, authentic but misdated, p. 21 n. 2
    • S 855. Comments, on formulation, notes similarity to S 844, pp. 27 n. 5, 28-9 n. 4
    • S 858. Comments, on formulation, pp. 28-9 n. 4
    • S 859. Comments, shares formulas with S 853, may cover Knole and Borstal in Kent, p. 190
    • S 860. Comments, authentic, no. 89
    • S 862. Comments, elements of 'Dunstan B' formulation, anomalous witness-list, p. 29
    • S 863. Comments, authentic, perhaps Ashford, Derbys, no. 109 and pp. 194-6
    • S 864. Comments, Winchester formulation, may be a copy, p. 28 n. 3
    • S 866. Comments, formulas suggest a Winchester origin, p. 29
    • S 872. Comments, on formulation, pp. 28 n. 1, 29 n. 5, 107, 161
    • S 878. Comments, authentic, MS 1 perhaps a slightly later copy, no. 91 and pp. 204-7
    • S 879. Comments, spurious, based on S 878, rejects identification with Pillaton, no. 92 and pp. 198-200
    • S 880. Comments, original, pp. 28 n. 1, 191
    • S 883. Comments, basically authentic, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 892. Comments, original, no. 66
    • S 898. Comments, original, subscriptions of two æthelings are later additions, no. 68
    • S 904. Comments, note on witness-list, p. 382
    • S 906. Comments, authentic, no. 40 (pp. 71, 84, 99, 109, 126)
    • S 907. Comments, p. 195
    • S 911. Comments, authentic, no. 69
    • S 914. Comments, reassesses as authentic, p. 385
    • S 917. Comments, possibly an exemplar for a forgery, pp. 209-11
    • S 918. Comments, some doubtful elements, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 919. Comments, based on a text from Athelstan's reign, pp. 195, 214, 247
    • S 920. Comments, authentic, no. 93 and pp. 213-18
    • S 922. Comments, authentic, MS 1 original, no. 110 and pp. 222-8
    • S 923. Comments, 'garbled and incomplete text of authentic charter, compiled in some provincial scriptorium, probably Burton', no. 112 and pp. 230-1
    • S 924. Comments, probably authentic, no. 111 and pp. 233-4
    • S 928. Comments, probably authentic, modelled on charter of King Athelstan, refers to Eckington, no. 113 and pp. 245-7
    • S 929. Comments, authentic, pp. 242-4
    • S 930. Comments, spurious, based on S 920, no. 94 and pp. 237-41
    • S 931. Comments, authentic, no. 15
    • S 937. Comments, authentic, Farnborough mistakenly identified as Farnborough, Berks, no. 67
    • S 942. Comments, dates to 990, p. 382
    • S 943. Comments, on notification clause, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 944. Comments, dates to 990, p. 382
    • S 957. Comments, spurious, no. 18
    • S 967. Comments, authentic, drawn up at Abingdon, no. 73
    • S 968. Comments, authentic, no. 133
    • S 971. Comments, in MS 1 dating clause and witness-list were added after folding, p. 25 n. 1
    • S 973. Comments, some authentic basis, no. 74
    • S 977. Comments, original, drawn up by diocesan bishop, no. 19
    • S 1000. Comments, spurious, no. 23 (pp. 64, 71-2, 88, 129)
    • S 1017. Comments, probably authentic, may refer to Bergh Apton in Norfolk, pp. 250-2
    • S 1030. Comments, spurious, no. 28
    • S 1039. Comments, spurious, no. 98
    • S 1040. Comments, spurious, no. 29 (pp. 65, 100)
    • S 1042. Comments, p. 384
    • S 1043. Comments, spurious, no. 30 (pp. 66, 100-1)
    • S 1067. Comments, authentic, no. 137
    • S 1071. Comments, original, p. 385
    • S 1084. Comments, original, p. 385
    • S 1098. Comments, spurious, no. 77
    • S 1099. Comments, authentic, no. 76
    • S 1110. Comments, authentic, no. 25
    • S 1140. Comments, original, no. 97
    • S 1155. Comments, spurious, no. 95
    • S 1159. Comments, authentic, no. 136
    • S 1160. Comments, authentic, no. 118 (pp. 113, 130)
    • S 1166. Comments, spurious, formulas are those of Athelstan's charters, p. 383
    • S 1177. Comments, authentic, no. 43
    • S 1213. Comments, donor is presumably Wulfstan of Dalham, p. 385
    • S 1214. Comments, probably forged 1097 x 1104, forger has modelled his text on a contemporary royal diploma, no. 56
    • S 1226. Comments, spurious, no. 22 (pp. 64, 71, 87, 129)
    • S 1233. Comments, spurious, no. 117
    • S 1237. Comments, authentic basis, no. 96
    • S 1243. Comments, authentic, no. 134
    • S 1250. Comments, authentic basis, S 1251 is an expanded, no. 45
    • S 1251. Comments, expanded version of S 1250, p. 75
    • S 1252. Comments, authentic, no. 41
    • S 1257. Comments, authentic, no. 47
    • S 1278. Comments, authentic, no. 51
    • S 1289. Comments, authentic, no. 52
    • S 1307. Comments, authentic, no. 58
    • S 1310. Comments, authentic, no. 59
    • S 1311. Comments, authentic, no. 60
    • S 1318. Comments, authentic, no. 61
    • S 1324. Comments, corrects Finberg's identification, Saberton is in Beckford, p. 381
    • S 1334. Comments, authentic, no. 63
    • S 1350. Comments, authentic, no. 64
    • S 1358. Comments, authentic, no. 65
    • S 1377. Comments, dates 971 x 975, p. 385
    • S 1380. Comments, authentic, no. 90
    • S 1388. Comments, authentic, no. 71
    • S 1390. Comments, on formulation, some witnesses have Norman names, p. 92 n. 1
    • S 1397. Comments, Saberton is in Beckford, p. 381
    • S 1421. Comments, original, no. 72
    • S 1448. Comments, authentic, dates c. 971 x 984, cf. p. 326, no. 7
    • S 1448a. Comments, no. 11
    • S 1453. Comments, authentic, no. 125
    • S 1479. Comments, authentic, no. 78
    • S 1493. Comments, authentic, translation of Old English exemplar, no. 116 (pp. 112-13, 124)
    • S 1497. Comments, original, no. 11A (p. 66)
    • S 1503. Comments, the reference is to Steeple Morden, p. 385
    • S 1523. Comments, authentic, no. 17
    • S 1536. Comments, authentic, no. 39 (pp. 71, 84, 99, 109, 126)
    • S 1565. Comments, no. 31 and p. 62
    • S 1566. Comments, no. 32
    • S 1574. Comments, treats as part of S 588, no. 53
    • S 602. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 172-4
    • S 768. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 179-80
    • S 853. Printed, pp. 187-8
    • S 863. Printed, pp. 193-4
    • S 878. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, pp. 201-3
    • S 879. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, pp. 196-8
    • S 917. Printed, pp. 208-9
    • S 920. Printed, pp. 211-13
    • S 922. Printed, pp. 219-22
    • S 923. Printed, pp. 228-30
    • S 924. Printed, pp. 232-3
    • S 928. Printed, pp. 244-5
    • S 929. Printed, pp. 241-2
    • S 930. Printed, pp. 235-7
    • S 1017. Printed, pp. 248-50
    • S 1493. Translated, part only, pp. 112-13