Show all data

• Metadata

  Whitelock 1969. Whitelock, D., 'review of Hart, ECEE', English Historical Review 84 (1969), 112–15. 16 charters cited.

  • S 437. Comments, p. 114
  • S 507. Comments, probably a genuine base at least, cf. agreements with S 506, p. 113
  • S 556. Comments, corrects a reading, p. 114
  • S 572. Comments, original beneficiary probably Wulfstan, pp. 112-13
  • S 595. Comments, corrects a reading, p. 114
  • S 792. Comments, correcting details of Hart's edition, p. 114
  • S 847. Comments, corrects a reading in Hart's edition, p. 114
  • S 931. Comments, must have been modelled on an earlier charter, corrects a reading in Hart's edition, pp. 113-14
  • S 943. Comments, corrects a reading, p. 114
  • S 947. Comments, may be acceptable in substance, but the royal style is odd and the formulas include some of Edgar's time, possibly refers to New Minster in Winchester, p. 113
  • S 948. Comments, corrects a reading, p. 114
  • S 1047. Comments, dubious, p. 113
  • S 1168. Comments, Slæpi is Islip, p. 112
  • S 1246. Comments, on identity of Quoengyth, pp. 114-15
  • S 1523. Comments, corrects a reading, p. 114
  • S 1531. Comments, no good reason to identify Bidicheseye with Bottisham, p. 112