Show all data

• Metadata

  Whitelock 1966. Whitelock, D., 'review of Finberg, ECW', English Historical Review 81 (1966), 100–03. 18 charters cited.

  • S 121. Comments, not above suspicion, discussed reference to royal palace at Tamworth, p. 102
  • S 149. Comments, highly suspicious, p. 103
  • S 281. Comments, witness-list tampered with to include Swithhun as deacon in 838 and bishop in 839, p. 101
  • S 315. Comments, treats as genuine, p. 102
  • S 333. Comments, close relationship to S 1032 needs explanation, pp. 101, 102
  • S 345. Comments, on internal reference to otherwise unknown campaign, p. 101
  • S 399. Comments, note on identity of beneficiary, p. 100
  • S 421. Comments, on formula, p. 102
  • S 511. Comments, epacts and concurrents als incorrect, charters of Edmund do not use these dating elements, p. 101
  • S 516. Comments, impossible date and anachronistic royal style, pp. 101, 102
  • S 611. Comments, authentic, on reference to a palace at Cheddar, p. 102
  • S 699. Comments, formulation from Athelstan's reign, if genuine then a very old-fashined document, p. 103
  • S 792. Comments, suspicious, cf. S 818, p. 103
  • S 799. Comments, spurious, incorrect date and regnal year for Edgar's coronation, p. 101
  • S 818. Comments, compare B 1275 and S 792
  • S 820. Comments, on a dating discrepancy, p. 101
  • S 1032. Comments, closely related to S 333, p. 101
  • S 1034. Comments, dating criteria inconsistent, p. 101