Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Brooke and Keir 1975

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Brooke and Keir 1975. Brooke, C. N. L., and G. Keir, London 800-1216: the Shaping of a City (London, 1975). 64 charters cited.

    • S 86. Comments, probably authentic, p. 367
    • S 88. Comments, probably authentic, p. 367
    • S 98. Comments, probably authentic, p. 367
    • S 124. Comments, spurious in received form, but probably based on a genuine tradition, pp. 295 n. 3, 367, 369
    • S 133. Comments, spurious but probably with a genuine base, p. 367
    • S 151. Comments, doubtful authenticity, p. 367
    • S 208. Comments, authentic basis, p. 367
    • S 346. Comments, of doubtful authenticity, possibly genuine in substance, pp. 346-7
    • S 645. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 670. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 774. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 894. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 903. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 940. Comments, doubtful, p. 368
    • S 997a. Comments, doubtless spurious, but reflecting tradition at Ghent, p. 296 n. 2
    • S 1002. Comments, forgery of mid 12th century, p. 368
    • S 1011. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1031. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 1036. Comments, spurious, p. 370
    • S 1039. Comments, mid-12th-century forgery, p. 369
    • S 1040. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1041. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1043. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1096. Comments, genuine, p. 368
    • S 1103. Comments, genuine; on port-reeve, pp. 96-8, 368, 371
    • S 1105. Comments, cited, pp. 296-7
    • S 1117. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1118. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1119. Comments, probably authentic; on Ulf, pp. 193, 369, 371
    • S 1120. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1121. Comments, pp. 193-4, 369, 371
    • S 1122. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1123. Comments, status uncertain, p. 369
    • S 1124. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1125. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 1126. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1127. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 1128. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 1129. Comments, perhaps expanded, p. 369
    • S 1130. Comments, authenticity uncertain; on sheriff, pp. 369, 371
    • S 1131. Comments, on sheriff, p. 372
    • S 1133. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1134. Comments, probably spurious copy of basically genuine writ, p. 369
    • S 1136. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1138. Comments, 12th-century forgery, p. 369
    • S 1141. Comments, probably spurious copy of basically genuine writ, p. 369
    • S 1142. Comments, possibly based on authentic writ, p. 368
    • S 1144. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1147. Comments, uncertain authenticity, p. 369
    • S 1149. Comments, on port-reeve, p. 372
    • S 1150. Comments, on port-reeve, p. 372
    • S 1234. Comments, pp. 135, 368, 372
    • S 1246. Comments, probably spurious, but incorporates early material, pp. 368, 370
    • S 1248. Comments, spurious, at least in present form, p. 370
    • S 1293. Comments, forgery, p. 369
    • S 1295. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1450. Comments, dubious, p. 369
    • S 1487. Comments, authentic, p. 369
    • S 1488. Comments, cited, p. 368
    • S 1489. Comments, authentic, pp. 368, 369
    • S 1497. Comments, cited, p. 368
    • S 1522. Comments, probably authentic, p. 369
    • S 1526. Comments, cited, p. 368
    • S 1103. Translated, pp. 96-7