Show all data

• Metadata

  BA Facs.. Keynes, S., Facsimiles of Anglo-Saxon Charters, Anglo-Saxon Charters, Supplementary series (London, 1991), 1. 67 charters cited.

  • S 20. Comments, MS 1 conceivably of given date, but more likely to be 9th-century, p. 3
  • S 43. Comments, spurious, MS 1 written late 10th century or early 11th century, imitating 8th-century minuscule, p. 8
  • S 204. Comments, p. 12
  • S 221. Comments, on crosses in margin, p. 12
  • S 255. Comments, basically authentic charter of Æthelheard combined with independent bounds of Creedy-land, p. 9
  • S 312. Comments, probably forged at the same time as S 313, p. 8
  • S 313. Comments, forged in early 11th century, p. 8
  • S 349. Comments, spurious, pp. 11-12
  • S 399. Comments, cited, p. 9
  • S 400. Comments, p. 9
  • S 403. Comments, p. 9
  • S 405. Comments, probably 'improved' version of lost original, pp. 8-9
  • S 416. Comments, p. 9
  • S 425. Comments, p. 9
  • S 433. Comments, spurious, p. 9
  • S 520. Comments, p. 12
  • S 544. Comments, p. 12
  • S 550. Comments, MS 1 a facsimile transcript of apparently original charter of King Eadred, p. 12
  • S 553. Comments, forgery, draws on charters of mid 950s, p. 10
  • S 602. Comments, not clear if MS 1 contemporary or later copy, p. 4
  • S 624. Comments, queries script-identification with S 646, p. 4
  • S 646. Comments, original, clearly from Ely, queries script-identification with S 624, p. 4
  • S 667. Comments, p. 12
  • S 670. Comments, written in second half of 10th century, conceivably 'original', cf. S 1351, p. 10
  • S 677. Comments, probably drafted by Mercian scribe, p. 12
  • S 704. Comments, probably contemporary but conceivably an 11th-century imitative forgery, p. 4
  • S 712a. Comments, same Mercian draftsman probably responsible for S 667, 677 and 723, p. 12
  • S 723. Comments, probably drafted by same scribe as S 667, 677, 712a, p. 12
  • S 731. Comments, on history of MS 1, p. 11
  • S 768. Comments, not clear if MS 1 contemporary or a later imitative copy, p. 4
  • S 774. Comments, text largely based on charters of Saint-Denis, one section apparently derived from expanded version of S 670 in S 1450 MS 2, names of bishops in witness-list probably taken from a charter of King Æthelred, p. 11
  • S 794. Comments, MS a later imitative copy, probably an adaptation of a genuine charter of Edgar, discrepancy between hidage assessments in text and in bounds, p. 8
  • S 878. Comments, original, p. 5
  • S 879. Comments, spurious, p. 8
  • S 884. Comments, original, p. 5
  • S 890. Comments, possibly a copy, p. 6 (no. 18)
  • S 892. Comments, unusual aspect but seems to be an original, p. 5
  • S 912. Comments, p. 8
  • S 916. Comments, p. 6
  • S 922. Comments, MS 1 apparently contemporary, p. 6
  • S 959. Comments, p. 10
  • S 971. Comments, MS 2 could be a fragment of a copy of a charter other than S 971, since it contains only part of a proem, p. 9
  • S 980. Comments, late-11th-century forgery, p. 10
  • S 1026. Comments, spurious, date in MS 1 now burned away, perhaps in antiquity, witnesses point to 1062 x 1065. Single sheet now differs from cartulary copy in several respects, e.g. internal reference to Abbot Æthelwig instead of Manning, names of several witnesses omitted, p. 10
  • S 1028. Comments, MS 1 anomalous, but conceivably an original charter drawn up in unusual circumstances, pp. 7-8
  • S 1031. Comments, appears to be original, p. 8
  • S 1033. Comments, authentic, p. 12
  • S 1043. Comments, MS 2 the pretended original, MS 1 a copy, p. 11
  • S 1098. Comments, on scribe of MS 1, p. 11
  • S 1105. Comments, p. 7
  • S 1120. Comments, p. 11.
  • S 1124. Comments, p. 11
  • S 1134. Comments, p. 11.
  • S 1137. Comments, p. 11
  • S 1138. Comments, p. 11
  • S 1141. Comments, p. 11
  • S 1184. Comments, MS 1 original, p. 3
  • S 1220. Comments, probably contemporary, pp. 6-7
  • S 1270. Comments, probably contemporary, p. 3
  • S 1296. Comments, probably contemporary, p. 8
  • S 1387. Comments, lease probably added to dorse of S 405 in third quarter of s. xi, p. 9
  • S 1450. Comments, consolidated record of the endowment of Westminster in 10th century, p. 10
  • S 1451a. Comments, MS 1 probably of Canterbury origin, perhaps early copy of presumed Crediton original, p. 5
  • S 1461. Comments, p. 7
  • S 1492. Comments, MS probably contemporary, p. 6
  • S 1497. Comments, p. 6
  • S 1522. Comments, MS 1 may be original, but script points to s. xi med., dating information probably read from Easter table, p. 6