Show all data

• Metadata

  Watkin 1956. Watkin, A., 'The Abbey of Malmesbury', in V.C.H. Wilts. III, ed. by R. B. Push and E. Crittall (Oxford, 1956), pp. 210–31. 32 charters cited.

  • S 71. Comments, p. 211 and n. 23
  • S 73. Comments, citing Stenton, genuine, p. 211 and n. 22
  • S 96. Comments, cited, Eanberht cannot have been abbot of Malmesbury, p. 229
  • S 149. Comments, cited, p. 212 and n. 55
  • S 231. Comments, dubious, p. 211 and n. 21
  • S 234. Comments, dubious, p. 211 and n. 21
  • S 243. Comments, citing Levison, genuine, p. 211 and n. 25
  • S 245. Comments, spurious, p. 211 and n. 45
  • S 246. Comments, may preserve traces of some genuine document, pp. 211-12 n. 34
  • S 256. Comments, spurious in present form, p. 229 and n. 35
  • S 258. Comments, pp. 212 and n. 53, 230 and n. 54
  • S 260. Comments, apparently genuine, p. 229 and n. 37
  • S 294b. Comments, p. 212 and n. 57
  • S 301. Comments, p. 212 and n. 57
  • S 305. Comments, does not inspire confidence, p. 229 and n. 43
  • S 306. Comments, p. 212 and n. 57
  • S 320. Comments, p. 212 and n. 57
  • S 356. Comments, p. 213 and n. 62
  • S 363. Comments, p. 213 and n. 63
  • S 454. Comments, p. 213 and n. 72
  • S 629. Comments, p. 213 and n. 75
  • S 796. Comments, some very doubtful features, p. 213 and n. 80
  • S 841. Comments, appears to have been retouched at a later date, p. 229 and n. 45
  • S 876. Comments, on attestation of abbot of Malmesbury, p. 229 and n. 47
  • S 891. Comments, p. 229 and n. 47
  • S 1166. Comments, citing Ehwald, authentic basis but altered, p. 211 and n. 20
  • S 1169. Comments, p. 211 and n. 24
  • S 1205. Comments, p. 213 and n. 63
  • S 1245. Comments, citing Ehwald, authentic but interpolated, pp. 211 and n. 19, 230
  • S 1251a. Comments, citing Ehwald, probably genuine, p. 212 and n. 42
  • S 1431b. Comments, pp. 212 and n. 56, 230 and n. 55
  • S 1577. Comments, p. 213 and n. 75