Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Dumville 1993

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Dumville 1993. Dumville, D. N., English Caroline Script and Monastic History: Studies in Benedictinism, A.D. 950–1030 (Woodbridge, 1993). 72 charters cited.

    • S 22. Comments, on scribe (Eadwig Basan) and script of MS 1, pp. 122 n. 59, 131, 139
    • S 67. Comments, notes Ramsey connection with estate., p. 48 n. 210
    • S 354. Comments, on Cholsey, p. 81 n. 372
    • S 507. Comments, deserves favourable reconsideration, pp. 35-6, 38
    • S 550. Comments, early modern script-facsimile, original apparently written in Caroline script, p. 142
    • S 594. Comments, on script, MS 1 original, pp. 16, 18, 52, 142
    • S 596. Comments, cited, p. 73 n. 330
    • S 646. Comments, p. 94
    • S 690. Comments, on script, pp. 2 n. 6, 16 n. 44, 18, 26 n. 82
    • S 697. Comments, on beneficiary, p. 73 n. 330
    • S 703. Comments, apparent original, pp. 13-14 n. 31
    • S 745. Comments, on script, pp. 2 n. 6, 143
    • S 772. Comments, on script, MS 1 probably written at Worcester in early 11th century, perhaps forged on basis of S 773, pp. 70-3
    • S 773. Comments, discusses connections with S 772, pp. 72-3
    • S 794. Comments, not contemporary, pp. 29-30 n. 101
    • S 801. Comments, pp. 29-30 n. 101
    • S 804. Comments, MS 1 is s. xv, pp. 29-30 n. 101
    • S 808. Comments, cited, pp. 29-30 n. 101
    • S 853. Comments, p. 93 n. 49
    • S 864. Comments, last surviving royal diploma written in Square Minuscule, p. 153 n. 72
    • S 876. Comments, authenticity uncertain, p. 135 n. 100
    • S 890. Comments, on script, p. 24 n. 79
    • S 905. Comments, original, third minim in date appears to be addition; Canterbury identity of scribe may be questionable, pp. 100-1 n. 91, 109-10 n. 142
    • S 914. Comments, disputes identification of scribe of MSS 3, 9, pp. 126
    • S 916. Comments, on script, p. 135
    • S 922. Comments, on script, pp. 134-5
    • S 950. Comments, on scribe and script, pp. 122, 126-7, 130-1
    • S 951. Comments, cited, p. 133
    • S 953. Comments, on script, pp. 132-4
    • S 954. Comments, of uncertain merit, p. 80
    • S 956. Comments, on script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 959. Comments, cited, p. 133
    • S 961. Comments, genuine, difficult to categorize palaeographically, pp. 117, 133, 134
    • S 963. Comments, regressive script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 971. Comments, regressive script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 974. Comments, on script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 980. Comments, pp. 37 n. 141, 40-1, 133
    • S 985. Comments, copy of authentic writ, discusses scribe, pp. 113 nn. 12-13, 116-17, 122, 139-40
    • S 994. Comments, on script of MS 1, pp. 132-4
    • S 995. Comments, cited, pp. 38, 133
    • S 1003. Comments, possibly written slightly later than 1044, pp. 133, 134
    • S 1004. Comments, on script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 1005. Comments, treats as contemporary, p. 133
    • S 1044. Comments, on script, pp. 133, 134
    • S 1045. Comments, spurious, pp. 37 n. 140, 38
    • S 1046. Comments, spurious, pp. 37 n. 140, 38
    • S 1078. Comments, pp. 36-7.
    • S 1084. Comments, cited, p. 37 n. 140
    • S 1213. Comments, cited, p. 35 n. 132
    • S 1326. Comments, cited, with reference to script, p. 153 n. 71
    • S 1347. Comments, on script, place-name probably an insertion, pp. 20, 22, 29, 56, 75-6
    • S 1371. Comments, on connections between Ramsey and Worcester, p. 48 n. 210
    • S 1381. Comments, the latest document in the original part of the cartulary, p. 66
    • S 1384. Comments, pp. 66 n. 287, 67 n. 292
    • S 1385. Comments, p. 66 n. 287
    • S 1388. Comments, pp. 66 n. 287, 67 n. 292
    • S 1393. Comments, note on script, p. 67
    • S 1394. Comments, p. 67 n. 292
    • S 1399. Comments, p. 67 n. 292
    • S 1405. Comments, note on script, p. 68
    • S 1407. Comments, dates 1053, unlikely to be a forgery although the script is regressive, pp. 67-8
    • S 1459. Comments, perhaps 1017, p. 67 n. 292
    • S 1467. Comments, cited, pp. 133, 134
    • S 1483. Comments, cited, p. 35
    • S 1486. Comments, cited, p. 36
    • S 1488. Comments, pp. 82-3
    • S 1489. Comments, dates 1023 x 1038, p. 42 and n. 177
    • S 1492. Comments, on a bequest, p. 51 n. 225
    • S 1494. Comments, cited, pp. 36, 81
    • S 1497. Comments, cited with reference to script, p. 30 n. 101
    • S 1515. Comments, p. 46
    • S 1526. Comments, cited with reference to Bury, p. 35