Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Napier and Stevenson

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Napier and Stevenson. Napier, A. S., and W. H. Stevenson, ed., The Crawford Collection of Early Charters and Documents (Oxford, 1895). 69 charters cited.

    • S 93. Comments, very dubious, p. 37 n. 1
    • S 255. Comments, authentic, discussion of bounds, see also S 1546b, pp. 37-64
    • S 367. Comments, original, cf. S 371, p. 83 n. 1
    • S 371. Comments, a puzzling document, apparently genuine, p. 83 n. 1
    • S 379. Comments, witnesses are of 931, pp. 66-7
    • S 391. Comments, correct date evidently 934, p. 104 n. 6
    • S 397. Comments, on beneficiary, pp. 74-5
    • S 403. Comments, authentic, p. 65
    • S 405. Comments, authentic, pp. 65-80
    • S 414. Comments, cannot be genuine in pesent form, witnesses are of A.D. 941, probably founded upon S 476, pp. 88, 137 n. 1
    • S 415. Comments, cannot be genuine in its present form, witnesses are of A.D. 941, p. 137 n. 1
    • S 434. Comments, apparently authentic, p. 137 n. 1
    • S 435. Comments, apparently authentic, p. 137 n. 1
    • S 436. Comments, composite charter, p. 137 n. 1
    • S 443. Comments, dubious, p. 67
    • S 450. Comments, dubious, pp. 74, 104 n. 6, 111
    • S 453. Comments, dubious, p. 85 n. 2
    • S 538. Comments, spurious, p. 85 n. 2
    • S 579. Comments, dates it 958-9, p. 88 n. 2
    • S 646. Comments, original, pp. 80-8
    • S 651. Comments, estate is in Dorset, p. 48 n. 2
    • S 668. Comments, on date, p. 119
    • S 670. Comments, early 11th-century hand, reads like a genuine charter, wrongly dated 951, probably 971, p. 90 and n. 1
    • S 724. Comments, suspicious, p. 118 and n. 1
    • S 731. Comments, doubtful, p. 85
    • S 753. Comments, identifies as Kelvedon Hatch, Essex, p. 124
    • S 774. Comments, spurious, pp. 88-102
    • S 798. Comments, suspicious, p. 82
    • S 828. Comments, pp. 120 n. 3
    • S 852. Comments, associates Henna rith in bounds with Hendred, Berks, p. 72
    • S 875. Comments, dubious, p. 65
    • S 876. Comments, obviously authentic, p. 121 n.
    • S 892. Comments, authentic, pp. 110-22
    • S 912. Comments, somewhat dubious; if spurious 'a singularly clever imitation'; complex date probably means 1005, pp. 78, 99-100, 121 n.
    • S 914. Comments, it must be dated 1001 or 1002, p. 135 n. 1
    • S 916. Comments, authentic, pp. 133-5
    • S 959. Comments, post-Conquest forgery perhaps founded on genuine charter of Cnut, pp. 136-51
    • S 981. Comments, untrustworthy, p. 142 n. 2
    • S 1000. Comments, spurious, pp. 94-5, 100
    • S 1041. Comments, spurious, p. 92
    • S 1043. Comments, spurious, p. 92
    • S 1217. Comments, spurious, pp. 88, 120
    • S 1221. Comments, impossible witnesses, p. 151
    • S 1226. Comments, p. 112
    • S 1293. Comments, forged, hand almost identical with S 774, p. 89
    • S 1296. Comments, authentic, pp. 102-10
    • S 1361. Comments, date copied wrongly, p. 121
    • S 1387. Comments, authentic, pp. 76-80
    • S 1450. Comments, dubious, p. 85
    • S 1492. Comments, authentic, pp. 125-33
    • S 1522. Comments, authentic, pp. 122-35
    • S 1546b. Comments, pp. 37-64
    • S 255. Printed, pp. 1-3
    • S 405. Printed, pp. 5-9
    • S 646. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 10-11 (no. 5)
    • S 774. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 12-18 (no. 6)
    • S 892. Printed, pp. 19-22 (no. 8)
    • S 916. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 24-7 (no. 11)
    • S 959. Printed, Latin, full version, ex MS 4, pp. 27-9 (no. 12)
    • S 1296. Printed, pp. 18-19 (no. 7)
    • S 1387. Printed, ex MS 1, p. 9 (no. 4, endorsement)
    • S 1492. Printed, pp. 23-4 (no. 10)
    • S 1522. Printed, p. 22 (no. 9)
    • S 1546b. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 3-4
    • S 1546b. Printed, ex MS 2, pp. 4-5
    • S 1296. Translated, pp. 106-7
    • S 1387. Translated, p. 77
    • S 1492. Translated, p. 126
    • S 1522. Translated, pp. 123-4