Show all data

• Metadata

  Forsberg 1950. Forsberg, R., A Contribution to a Dictionary of Old English Place-Names, Nomina Germanica (Uppsala, 1950), 9. 74 charters cited.

  • S 43. Comments, suggests that Dene can perhaps be identified with Preston near Brighton, pp. 63-4
  • S 54. Comments, on bounds, pp. 126-7
  • S 102. Comments, pp. 155-6
  • S 104. Comments, on bounds, pp. 168, 201
  • S 169. Comments, p. 122 n
  • S 219. Comments, on bounds, p. 211
  • S 230. Comments, on boundary mark, p. 173 n.
  • S 242. Comments, on bounds, p. 211
  • S 254. Comments, on a boundary point, suggests Cearn is Charmouth, Dorset, p. 172
  • S 290. Comments, bounds cover western part of Halstock only, p. 217
  • S 292. Comments, p. 201
  • S 328. Comments, on bounds, p. 202
  • S 343. Comments, p. 8
  • S 355. Comments, on bounds, p. 24
  • S 374. Comments, bounds describe Wonston, not Sutton Scotney, pp. 202-3
  • S 382. Comments, on bounds, pp. 203-4
  • S 422. Comments, on bounds, pp. 5-6
  • S 424. Comments, on bounds, pp. 8-9, 182
  • S 425. Comments, p. 47 n
  • S 432. Comments, p. 81
  • S 461. Comments, on bounds, p. 112
  • S 473. Comments, on bounds, p. 204
  • S 485. Comments, on bounds and identification of Winterbourne, p. 204
  • S 490. Comments, on bounds, p. 205
  • S 498. Comments, pp. 205-6
  • S 502. Comments, on bounds, pp. 143-4
  • S 513. Comments, on bounds, pp. 206-7
  • S 516. Comments, on bounds, p. 6
  • S 524. Comments, on bounds, pp. 158-9
  • S 525. Comments, on bounds, p. 110
  • S 542. Comments, on bounds, pp. 207-8
  • S 543. Comments, on a boundary mark, pp. 38-9
  • S 568. Comments, bounds describe eastern part of Chisledon, i.e. the former manor of Badbury, p. 7
  • S 570. Comments, on bounds, p. 159
  • S 582. Comments, p. 126
  • S 631. Comments, on beginning of bounds, p. 86
  • S 648. Comments, pp. 208-9
  • S 661. Comments, on bounds, p 19
  • S 662a. Comments, on bounds, pp. 209-10
  • S 690. Comments, on bounds, p. 207
  • S 693. Comments, on bounds, pp. 210-11
  • S 714. Comments, on bounds, p. 110
  • S 724. Comments, on bounds, pp. 33-4
  • S 737. Comments, on bounds, pp. 25-6
  • S 764. Comments, on bounds, pp. 143-4
  • S 766. Comments, on a boundary mark, p. 171
  • S 784. Comments, on bounds, p. 158
  • S 786. Comments, on bounds in Cromban and of Longdon, pp. 212-13
  • S 803. Comments, on identification and bounds, pp. 214-15
  • S 820. Comments, bounds also include Aldershot, Farnborough, Cove, Hawley and Yateley, p. 214
  • S 831. Comments, estate also includes Bathampton, p. 215
  • S 842. Comments, on bounds of Bathingbourne, pp. 209-10
  • S 852. Comments, Osanlea may be Ossemsley in Milton, Hants, p. 217
  • S 862. Comments, on bounds, pp. 165-6, 216
  • S 868. Comments, on bounds, pp. 215-16
  • S 869. Comments, on identification, pp. 208-9
  • S 896. Comments, on bounds, p. 13
  • S 909. Comments, on bounds, p. 30
  • S 942. Comments, on bounds, p. 216
  • S 944. Comments, on bounds, identifies Stanham as South Stoneham, pp. 216-17
  • S 998. Comments, on bounds, p. 43
  • S 1012. Comments, on bounds, identifies as South Stoneham, pp. 216-17
  • S 1038. Comments, p. 216
  • S 1254. Comments, pp. 72, 74
  • S 1264. Comments, on identification of Liminum, p. 123 n.
  • S 1280. Comments, on a boundary mark, p. 23
  • S 1322. Comments, bounds describe Croome D'Abitot, p. 212
  • S 1338. Comments, on bounds, p. 67
  • S 1410. Comments, p. 75 n
  • S 1493. Comments, on place-names, p. 148
  • S 1553. Comments, p. 9
  • S 1573. Comments, p. 73
  • S 1577. Comments, p. 208
  • S 1595. Comments, p. 27