Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Stevenson 1904

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Stevenson 1904. Stevenson, W. H., ed., Asser's Life of King Alfred (Oxford, 1904). 110 charters cited.

    • S 10. Comments, p. 220
    • S 12. Comments, seems to be genuine, p. 220
    • S 34. Comments, genuine, p. 331 n. 4
    • S 70. Comments, p. 155 n. 6
    • S 149. Comments, open to grave suspicion, p. 201
    • S 167. Comments, dubious, p. 229 n. 1
    • S 191. Comments, doubtful, p. 229 n. 4
    • S 197. Comments, cited, p. 229 n. 4
    • S 202. Comments, doubtful, p. 229, n. 4
    • S 217. Comments, if genuine, date must be 887, p. 300
    • S 226. Comments, spurious, pp. 199 n. 9
    • S 237. Comments, spurious, p. lxxvii n. 1
    • S 242. Comments, spurious, cf. S 309 for same formulas, immunity clause from Edgar's chancery, p. 216 n. 3
    • S 253. Comments, doubtful, p. 201
    • S 254. Comments, doubtful, p. 201
    • S 268. Comments, suspicious, pp. 205-6
    • S 270. Comments, 10th-century imitative copy of genuine charter, with error in copying date, p. 199 n. 2
    • S 280. Comments, a later 10th-century copy, p. 199 n. 3
    • S 288. Comments, the formulas agree with genuine charters of Æthelwulf, p. 235 n. 2
    • S 293. Comments, in English script but apparently drafted by a Frank, p. 203 n. 1
    • S 294a. Comments, spurious, p. 190
    • S 294b. Comments, dubious, p. 199
    • S 303. Comments, dubious, pp. 186-91, 199
    • S 304. Comments, dubious, pp. 186-91, 199
    • S 305. Comments, dubious, pp. 186-91, 199
    • S 308. Comments, 'written by a scribe who was not an Englishman in an imitative hand with may have been copied from an earlier (spurious) original', pp. 187-8
    • S 309. Comments, doubtful, uses same formulas as S 242 (spurious), including immunity clause from Edgar's chancery, p. 216 and n. 2
    • S 310. Comments, spurious, p. 187 n. 4
    • S 311. Comments, dubious, p. 256
    • S 313. Comments, spurious, p. 703
    • S 315. Comments, apparently authentic, pp. 188 and n. 2, 193 and n. 4
    • S 316. Comments, possibly contemporary, there is an error in the indiction and the charter may belong to 853, p. 193 and n. 3
    • S 319. Comments, a strange 11th-century charter, p. 216 n. 1
    • S 320. Comments, suspicious, p. 199
    • S 325. Comments, spurious, p. 246
    • S 326. Comments, suspicious, p. 216 n. 3
    • S 327. Comments, an 11th-century copy, clearly genuine despite error in date, p. 230 n. 2
    • S 337. Comments, a blundered charter, some witnesses seem to come from a genuine charter of c. 868, p. 229 n. 4
    • S 340. Comments, suspicious, pp. 229 n. 4, 299 n.4
    • S 340. Comments, suspicious, pp. 229 n. 4, 299 n.4
    • S 343. Comments, spurious, p. 259 n. 4
    • S 344. Comments, a 9th-century hand, the work of a scribe ignorant of Latin, hee seems to have copied twice over the witnesses of a charter of King Æthelwulf, p. 199 n. 4
    • S 345. Comments, dubious, p. 330 n. 6
    • S 346. Comments, genuine, p. lxvi and n. 3
    • S 347. Comments, spurious, p. 155 n. 3
    • S 348. Comments, spurious, pp. lxvii, 151
    • S 349. Comments, a clumsy 12th-century forgery, partly based on Asser, p. 201 n. 4
    • S 350. Comments, language must be considerably later than Alfred's time, probably a non-English hand, seems to be somewhat later in date, pp. 151 n. 2, 290 n. 1
    • S 353. Comments, spurious, p. 151 n. 2
    • S 354. Comments, spurious or interpolated, mentions Danegeld, pp. 151 n. 2, 299 and n. 3
    • S 356. Comments, spurious, p. lxvii
    • S 358. Comments, spurious, pp. 192-3
    • S 360. Comments, forged early in the 11th century, p. 155 n. 3
    • S 364. Comments, spurious, p. 304 n. 8
    • S 365. Comments, spurious, pp. 191 n. 1, 210
    • S 370. Comments, forgery of early 11th century, p. 155 n. 3
    • S 373. Comments, spurious, p. 192 n. 5
    • S 374. Comments, spurious, p. 312 n. 2
    • S 376. Comments, very suspicious, p. 322 n. 6
    • S 377. Comments, very suspicious, p. 322 n. 6
    • S 380. Comments, possibly genuine, p. lxvi n. 1
    • S 383. Comments, very suspicious, p. 322 n. 6
    • S 384. Comments, spurious, p. 192 n. 6
    • S 403. Comments, authentic, p. 330, n. 6
    • S 404. Comments, spurious or much corrupted, p. 150-1 n. 1, 152 n. 3
    • S 420. Comments, spurious, p. 152 n. 3
    • S 427. Comments, suspicious, p. 148 n. 1
    • S 436. Comments, apparently prepared and interpolated by William of Malmesbury, p. 246 n. 4
    • S 472. Comments, probably spurious, p. 150 n. 2
    • S 478. Comments, may be genuine, p. 255 n. 2
    • S 672. Comments, obviously spurious, p. 150 and n. 3
    • S 691. Comments, on identification, p. 275 and n. 4
    • S 725. Comments, more or less suspicious, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 731. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 739. Comments, more or less suspicious, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 746. Comments, suspicious, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 767. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 771. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 779. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 783. Comments, forgery, p. 305 n. 7
    • S 786. Comments, more or less suspicious, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 788. Comments, more or less suspicious, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 789. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 792. Comments, dubious, p. 256
    • S 794. Comments, authentic, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 795. Comments, authentic, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 800. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 801. Comments, authentic, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 806. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 807. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 825. Comments, spurious, p. 191 n. 1
    • S 837. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 854. Comments, spurious, p. 241
    • S 870. Comments, on term curtis, p. 220 n. 7
    • S 904. Comments, doubtful, p. 202 n. 2
    • S 940. Comments, dubious, p. 220 n. 7
    • S 965. Comments, clumsy fabrication, p. 305 n. 7
    • S 1034. Comments, clearly modelled on S 380 and probably spurious, p. lxvi n. 1
    • S 1179. Comments, spurious, p. 235 n. 3
    • S 1201. Comments, doubtful, pp. 229 n. 4, 299 n. 4
    • S 1203. Comments, genuine, MS 1 in slightly later hand, p. 290 n. 1
    • S 1207. Comments, p. 192
    • S 1276. Comments, authentic, p. 290 n. 1
    • S 1279. Comments, seems to be genuine, p. 305
    • S 1282. Comments, spurious or interpolated, p. 147
    • S 1284. Comments, dubious, p. 199
    • S 1292. Comments, may be genuine, p. 202 n. 3
    • S 1416. Comments, p. 330 n. 6
    • S 1440. Comments, dubious, p. 229 n. 4
    • S 1526. Comments, authentic, p. 232