Show all data

• Metadata

  Keynes 1994b. Keynes, S., 'The West Saxon Charters of King Æthelwulf and His Sons', English Historical Review 109 (1994), 1109–49. 97 charters cited.

  • S 202. Comments, unacceptable in received form, notes diplomatic links with West Saxon charters, p. 1119
  • S 264. Comments, may be original, p. 1110 n. 2
  • S 272. Comments, spurious in received form but forger has used charters of 820s, cf. S 273-6, 283-4, pp. 1111-12
  • S 273. Comments, spurious in received from, but date and witness-list derived from charter of mid 820s, perhaps partly modelled on a charter of King Brihtric and partly on S 340, pp. 1111-12
  • S 274. Comments, spurious in received form but forger has used charters of mid 820s, pp. 1111-12
  • S 275. Comments, spurious in received form but forger has used charters of mid 820s, pp. 1111-12
  • S 276. Comments, spurious in received form, but forger has used charters of mid 820s, witness-list partly based on S 446, pp. 1111-12
  • S 277. Comments, pp. 1112-13
  • S 278. Comments, probably spurious, but may use some authentic material, witness-list a mixture of West Saxon, Kentish and Mercian elements, p. 1112
  • S 281. Comments, not acceptable in received form, based on S 1438, perhaps emanated from circle of later West Saxon king, p. 1114 n. 3
  • S 283. Comments, spurious, some details from a charter of mid 820s, proem from a 10th-century model, pp. 1111-12, esp. p. 1111 n. 2
  • S 284. Comments, spurious in received form, some details derived from a charter of mid 820s, pp. 1111-12, esp. p. 1111 n. 4
  • S 288. Comments, on links with S 290, pp. 1114-15
  • S 290. Comments, authentic, compare S 288, pp. 1114-15, 1122-3
  • S 292. Comments, contemporary diplomatic, meeting-place may have been in the Weald, p. 1115
  • S 294. Comments, probably spurious, pp. 1114 n. 3, 1115-16
  • S 294a. Comments, probably spurious, witness-list and date from genuine charter of 844, pp. 1115-16
  • S 294b. Comments, probably spurious, date and witness-list from a genuine charter of 844, pp. 1115-16
  • S 298. Comments, in West Saxon diplomatic tradition, queries Chaplais's script identification, pp. 1116-18
  • S 300. Comments, on formulation, pp. 1118-19
  • S 301. Comments, may not originally have been in favour of Malmesbury, p. 1118
  • S 302. Comments, authentic basis, pp. 1119-22, esp. p. 1121 n. 5
  • S 303. Comments, basic form of Second Decimation charters seems acceptable, pp. 1119-23
  • S 304. Comments, basic form of 'Second Decimation' charters seems acceptable, pp. 1119-23, esp. p. 1121 n. 3
  • S 305. Comments, basic form of 'Second Decimation' charters seems acceptable, pp. 1119-23
  • S 306. Comments, fabrication perhaps based on 'Second Decimation' charter, pp. 1121-2
  • S 307. Comments, basic form of 'Second Decimation' charters seems acceptable, pp. 1119-21, esp. p. 1121 n. 3
  • S 308. Comments, MS of disreputable appearance and uncertain date (? s. xi), but basic form of 'Second Decimation' charters seems acceptable, pp. 1119-21, esp. p. 1121 n. 3
  • S 309. Comments, spurious, dating clause and witness-list from a 'Second Decimation' charter, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 310. Comments, spurious, dating clause and witness-list from a 'Second Decimation' charter, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 311. Comments, spurious, dating clause and witness-list from a 'Second Decimation' charter, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 312. Comments, spurious form of 'Second Decimation charter', p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 313. Comments, spurious form of 'Second Decimation' charter, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 317. Comments, spurious, operative formulas derived from 10th-century text and witness-list from one of the decimation texts of 854, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 320. Comments, witnesses seem to belong to late 830s, may have been drawn up in Kent, p. 1112
  • S 325. Comments, spurious, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 326. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1129
  • S 329. Comments, authentic, perhaps drawn up by a royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1129
  • S 331. Comments, original, p. 1132 n. 5
  • S 332. Comments, original, p. 1132 n. 6
  • S 333. Comments, probably free translation of Latin charter, pp. 1123-31, esp. p. 1125 n. 3
  • S 334. Comments, authentic basis, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1125
  • S 335. Comments, likely to be authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, Æthelred may have enjoyed some power in his brother's lifetime, pp. 1123-34, esp. pp. 1129-31
  • S 336. Comments, likely to be authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, Æthelred may have enjoyed some power in his brother's lifetime., pp. 1123-31, esp. pp. 1124, 1129-30
  • S 338. Comments, original, p. 1133 n. 2
  • S 338a. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-31, esp. pp. 1130-1
  • S 340. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. pp. 1124, 1130
  • S 341. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1125
  • S 340. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. pp. 1124, 1130
  • S 341. Comments, authentic, perhaps drafted by royal scribe, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1125
  • S 342. Comments, pp. 1123-34, esp. p. 1125
  • S 342a. Comments, not genuine, p. 1134 n. 3
  • S 343. Comments, not acceptable in received form, but probably based on an authentic charter of 870s, p. 1134
  • S 343a. Comments, not genuine, p. 1134 n. 3
  • S 345. Comments, authentic basis, probably rewritten by a forger, p. 1135
  • S 347. Comments, contemporary formulation, cf. S 348, p. 1136
  • S 348. Comments, contemporary formulation, cf. S 347, pp. 1136-7
  • S 350. Comments, original, pp. 1140-1
  • S 352. Comments, idiosyncratic but may be authentic, pp. 1134-5
  • S 354. Comments, may be authentic, possibly a survival from royal archives, pp. 1137-8
  • S 355. Comments, probably acceptable, pp. 1139-40
  • S 356. Comments, authentic basis, but probably substantially rewritten at Malmesbury, pp. 1138-9
  • S 358. Comments, not authentic, but transaction probably genuine, pp. 1141-2
  • S 359. Comments, may be substantially authentic, pp. 1141-2
  • S 360. Comments, forgery, p. 1141
  • S 362. Comments, may have been drafted by same agency as S 364; on vernacular note, pp. 1143, 1145-6
  • S 363. Comments, formulation may be contemporary, p. 1143
  • S 364. Comments, may have been drafted by same agency as S 362, p. 1143
  • S 365. Comments, on formulation, same witness-list as S 366, pp. 1120 n. 2, 1142-3
  • S 366. Comments, same witness-list as S 365, pp. 1138 n. 2, 1142-3
  • S 367. Comments, cited, pp. 1143-4
  • S 367a. Comments, cited, pp. 1143-4
  • S 368. Comments, cited, meeting-place perhaps Milton, Dorset, p. 1144
  • S 369. Comments, beneficiary may have been a Winchester priest, pp. 1144, 1146
  • S 371. Comments, cited, pp. 1143-4
  • S 372. Comments, 'makes a good impression', pp. 1144-5
  • S 373. Comments, 'makes a good impression', pp. 1144-5
  • S 374. Comments, 'makes a good impression', pp. 1144-5
  • S 375. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 376. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 377. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 378. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 380. Comments, the estates later passed to Wells Minster and S 380 was used by Bishop Giso of Wells in drawing up S 1024 for Bath Abbey, p. 1144
  • S 381. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 382. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 383. Comments, suspicious, p. 1145
  • S 545. Comments, cited with reference to formulation, p. 1140 n. 1
  • S 819. Comments, spurious, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 820. Comments, spurious, p. 1117 n. 32
  • S 825. Comments, spurious, p. 1122 n. 1
  • S 1034. Comments, p. 1144 n
  • S 1205. Comments, on formulation, p. 1143
  • S 1274. Comments, probably acceptable, perhaps drafted by royal priest, pp. 1123-31, esp. pp. 1123, 1124 n., 1127-8
  • S 1284. Comments, not authentic, but transaction probably genuine, pp. 1141-2
  • S 1286. Comments, 'makes a good impression', pp. 1144-5
  • S 1438. Comments, pp. 1112-14
  • S 1443. Comments, note on MSS, p. 1142