Show all data

• Metadata

  Harmer, Writs. Harmer, F. E., Anglo-Saxon Writs (Manchester, 1952). 325 charters cited.

  • S 26. Comments, based on authentic material, p. 568
  • S 86. Comments, probably authentic, p. 568
  • S 87. Comments, based on authentic material, p. 568
  • S 124. Comments, authenticity doubtful, pp. 500-1
  • S 223. Comments, on reference to tolls, p. 410
  • S 325. Comments, authenticity frequently questioned, p. 374 and nn. 1 & 2
  • S 376. Comments, authenticity not certain, p. 373
  • S 439. Comments, doubtful, p. 374 nn. 1 & 2
  • S 456. Comments, spurious, post-Conquest wording, p. 14 n. 1
  • S 507. Comments, generally considered spurious, p. 144 and n. 1
  • S 659. Comments, unexceptionable, p. 75
  • S 725. Comments, p. 551
  • S 731. Comments, may be founded on authentic material, p. 267 n. 2
  • S 774. Comments, spurious, dates MS 1 to c. 1100, pp. 338-9
  • S 806. Comments, not authentic, but probably a substantial basis of fact, pp. 524-5
  • S 817. Comments, Englsh version a paraphrase of the Latin, pp. 374, 377-9
  • S 818. Comments, on Chilcomb, p. 374
  • S 825. Comments, cited, p. 524
  • S 894. Comments, spurious, p. 287
  • S 895. Comments, spurious, p. 485
  • S 904. Comments, cited, p. 551
  • S 914. Comments, p. 453
  • S 925. Comments, p. 383
  • S 945. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 235-7, 468
  • S 946. Comments, authenticity doubtful, pp. 373-80, 523-4
  • S 952. Comments, doubtful, p. 169 and n. 1
  • S 955. Comments, p. 574
  • S 959. Comments, linguistic forms of English version later than Cnut's reign; authenticity not entirely above suspicion, pp. 177 n. 1, 426
  • S 960. Comments, on witnesses, p. 574
  • S 961. Comments, p. 576
  • S 972. Comments, may be genuine, pp. 455, 552
  • S 976. Comments, may or may not be authentic, cf. S 1151, p. 382
  • S 979. Comments, if genuine should be dated 1023 x 1024, p. 565
  • S 980. Comments, authenticity in present form questionable, cf. S 1046, pp. 433-4
  • S 981. Comments, spurious, p. 239
  • S 985. Comments, authentic, pp. 168-71, 446-8
  • S 986. Comments, authentic, pp. 171, 449-50
  • S 987. Comments, authentic, pp. 171-2, 450
  • S 988. Comments, authentic, pp. 172, 450
  • S 989. Comments, spurious, pp. 190-1, 454
  • S 990. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 191-7, 454-7
  • S 991. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 225-7
  • S 992. Comments, authenticity uncertain, may have been tampered with, pp. 239-40, 468-9
  • S 995. Comments, spurious, pp. 434-5
  • S 996. Comments, authentic, pp. 245-6, 471
  • S 997. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 245-6, 471
  • S 1000. Comments, suspicious, p. 37
  • S 1002. Comments, spurious, pp. 82, 560, 571
  • S 1004. Comments, pp. 427, 576
  • S 1011. Comments, spurious, p. 59 and n. 1
  • S 1012. Comments, probably authentic, dated after 22 April 1045, p. 550
  • S 1024. Comments, suspect, p. 247 n. 2
  • S 1025. Comments, dated 1054 but attested by Eadsige, archbishop of Canterbury, who died in 1050, p. 566
  • S 1026. Comments, on date, p. 566
  • S 1028. Comments, MS 1 probably later copy of authentic diploma, pp. 35-7, 41, 244
  • S 1029. Comments, suspicious, p. 37
  • S 1030. Comments, spurious, pp. 60, 291, 473
  • S 1034. Comments, probably at least founded on fact, p. 430
  • S 1035. Comments, unlikely to be authentic in its present form, p. 203
  • S 1036. Comments, spurious, pp. 37, 59, 560
  • S 1037a. Comments, spurious, p. 547
  • S 1038. Comments, not authentic in present form but possibly founded on genuine material, pp. 37, 39 n. 3, 127 n. 2
  • S 1039. Comments, spurious, p. 290
  • S 1040. Comments, spurious, pp. 290-2
  • S 1041. Comments, spurious, pp. 60, 290, 560
  • S 1042. Comments, spurious, p. 489
  • S 1043. Comments, spurious, pp. 60, 289-91
  • S 1045. Comments, authenticity more than dubious, p. 141 n. 2
  • S 1046. Comments, spurious, p. 141 n. 2
  • S 1047. Comments, not authentic in present form but may contain authentic material, p. 175 n. 5
  • S 1048. Comments, spurious, p. 195 and n. 2
  • S 1051. Comments, not authentic in present form, pp. 37, 222 n. 2
  • S 1054. Comments, dubious, p. 16 n. 1
  • S 1055. Comments, spurious, pp. 426, 555
  • S 1058. Comments, on a witness, dates charter 1044 x 1051, p. 574
  • S 1063. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 119-20, 425-6
  • S 1064. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 119-22, 427
  • S 1065. Comments, spurious, but may be based on an authentic writ, pp. 123-5, 428-9
  • S 1066. Comments, spurious, but may be based on authentic writ, pp. 123-31, 429
  • S 1067. Comments, authentic, pp. 135-7, 431-3
  • S 1068. Comments, authentic except perhaps for the last sentence, pp. 138-45, 433-5
  • S 1069. Comments, authentic, pp. 145-7, 435-7
  • S 1070. Comments, spurious, pp. 147, 437
  • S 1071. Comments, authentic, pp. 139, 437-8
  • S 1072. Comments, authentic, pp. 139-40, 438
  • S 1073. Comments, authentic, pp. 139-40, 438
  • S 1074. Comments, authentic, pp. 148, 438-9
  • S 1075. Comments, authentic, pp. 139, 439-40
  • S 1076. Comments, authentic, pp. 148-9, 440
  • S 1077. Comments, authentic, pp. 148-9, 440
  • S 1078. Comments, pp. 147-8, 440-2
  • S 1079. Comments, authentic, pp. 139, 442
  • S 1080. Comments, pp. 149, 442-3
  • S 1081. Comments, authentic, pp. 149-50, 443
  • S 1082. Comments, authentic, pp. 149-50, 443
  • S 1083. Comments, authentic, pp. 140, 443
  • S 1084. Comments, authentic, MS 1 contemporary, pp. 147-8, 443-4
  • S 1085. Comments, authentic, pp. 150-1, 444-6
  • S 1086. Comments, authenticity extremely doubtful, pp. 178, 451
  • S 1087. Comments, dubious authenticity, pp. 178-80, 451
  • S 1088. Comments, an authentic writ, with all but the first three lines rewritten later, pp. 173-5, 451-2
  • S 1089. Comments, authenticity unclear, may be expanded version of genuine writ or a post-Conquest fabrication, pp. 175-8, 452-3
  • S 1090. Comments, authentic, pp. 180-1, 453-4
  • S 1091. Comments, authentic, pp. 197, 457
  • S 1092. Comments, authentic, pp. 197, 457-9
  • S 1093. Comments, authenticity dubious, pp. 205-8, 459-60
  • S 1094. Comments, authenticity in doubt, pp. 2035-8, 460
  • S 1095. Comments, authenticity in doubt, pp. 203-5, 460-1
  • S 1096. Comments, authentic, pp. 201-2, 461
  • S 1097. Comments, authentic, pp. 211-13, 461
  • S 1098. Comments, spurious, pp. 214-18, 462-3
  • S 1099. Comments, authentic, pp. 218-19, 463-4
  • S 1100. Comments, authentic, pp. 222-4, 464
  • S 1101. Comments, authentic, pp. 227-9, 465-6
  • S 1102. Comments, authentic, pp. 224-30, 466
  • S 1103. Comments, pp. 231-4, 466-8
  • S 1104. Comments, probably an authentic basis with interpolation, pp. 237-9, 469-70
  • S 1105. Comments, authentic, pp. 243-4, 470-1
  • S 1106. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 245-6, 472
  • S 1107. Comments, seems generally authentic but anathema is suspicious, pp. 245-6, 472
  • S 1108. Comments, authentic, the soke infra Bichamdic was that of the hundred and a half of Clackclose, appurtenant to the Ramsey manor of Wimsbotsham, pp. 246-8, 472-3
  • S 1109. Comments, spurious, address points to a date 1057/8 x 1066, while the witnesses are appropriate for 1045 x 1053, pp. 249-52, 473-8
  • S 1110. Comments, spurious, but address may have been taken from an authentic writ of 1055 x 1065, pp. 252-6, 478-92
  • S 1111. Comments, authentic, pp. 272, 486-7
  • S 1112. Comments, authentic, pp. 272, 487-8
  • S 1113. Comments, authentic, pp. 272-3, 488
  • S 1114. Comments, probably spurious, version of S 1113 with the place-name omitted, pp. 273, 488
  • S 1115. Comments, authentic, pp. 273-4, 489
  • S 1116. Comments, authentic, pp. 274, 489-90
  • S 1117. Comments, probably not fully authentic in present form, may be of late 11th-century date, pp. 301, 492-4
  • S 1118. Comments, probably spurious, pp. 301-3, 494-5
  • S 1119. Comments, perhaps a poor copy of an authentic writ, may have been reworked at Westminster, pp. 307-8, 495
  • S 1120. Comments, probably a fabrication, very imperfect seal of reddish-white wax, attached upside-down sur simple queue, wrapping-tie, pp. 299-301, 495-6
  • S 1121. Comments, possibly an authentic writ, enlarged and embellished, pp. 308-9, 496-9
  • S 1122. Comments, probably forged in connection with a dispute which arose soon after the Conquest, pp. 313-15, 499-501
  • S 1123. Comments, authenticity doubtful, may be interpolated, must belong to 1049, pp. 315-16, 501-4
  • S 1124. Comments, a forgery based on a probably authentic writ of the Confessor, manipulated so as to support the claim of Westminster Abbey to the estate, pp. 316-18, 504-5
  • S 1125. Comments, script seems to belong to later 11th century, probably a slightly later copy of an original writ, pp. 318, 505
  • S 1126. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 318-19, 505-6
  • S 1127. Comments, possibly copy of authentic writ, if S 1126 is accepted there is no reason for rejecting S 1127, pp. 318-19, 506
  • S 1128. Comments, dubious, possibly based on an authentic writ, pp. 299, 506-7
  • S 1129. Comments, probably represents an authentic writ, altered and expanded, pp. 309-10, 507-9
  • S 1130. Comments, dubious, pp. 319-20, 509
  • S 1131. Comments, authentic, pp. 319-20, 509-10
  • S 1132. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 320-1, 510
  • S 1133. Comments, probably spurious, interpolated version of S 1132, pp. 320-2, 510
  • S 1134. Comments, probably copy of authentic writ, pp. 322-3, 511
  • S 1135. Comments, dubious, may represent an 'improved' version of an authentic writ, pp. 310-11, 511-12
  • S 1136. Comments, authenticity doubtful, pp. 311-13, 512
  • S 1137. Comments, spurious, pp. 303-6, 512-14
  • S 1138. Comments, slightly modernised version of authentic writ, pp. 323-4, 514-15
  • S 1139. Comments, authentic, pp. 324, 515
  • S 1140. Comments, MS 1 probably an original writ, pp. 324-6, 516
  • S 1141. Comments, late-11th-century copy of authentic writ, pp. 327-8, 516-17
  • S 1142. Comments, may represent an authentic writ altered and expanded, MS 1 late 11th-century, pp. 313, 328-30, 517-19
  • S 1143. Comments, probably modernised version of authentic writ, pp. 330, 519-20
  • S 1144. Comments, probably spurious, some imitation of Anglo-Saxon script in MS 2, pp. 330-1, 520
  • S 1145. Comments, may be altered and enlarged version of an original writ, pp. 331-2, 520-1
  • S 1146. Comments, possibly based on an authentic writ, but enlarged and embellished at Westminster, pp. 313, 328-30, 521
  • S 1147. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 334-6, 521-2
  • S 1148. Comments, mixture of authentic and spurious material, no reason to doubt instruction to Wigod, some imitation of Anglo-Saxon script in MS 2, pp. 336-7, 522-3
  • S 1149. Comments, very dubious but probably contains authentic material, pp. 332-4, 523
  • S 1150. Comments, dubious but probably contains authentic material, pp. 332-4, 523
  • S 1151. Comments, possibly authentic in substance, pp. 381-2, 525
  • S 1152. Comments, probably an enlarged and improved version of S 1151, pp. 381-2, 525
  • S 1153. Comments, apparently authentic except for the final clause relating to Hayling, pp. 382-5, 526
  • S 1154. Comments, many questionable features, pp. 385-7, 526
  • S 1155. Comments, cannot be authentic in present form and may be entire fabrication, pp. 403-6, 527
  • S 1156. Comments, authentic, pp. 407-9, 528
  • S 1157. Comments, slightly modernized copy of an authentic writ, pp. 409, 528
  • S 1158. Comments, authentic, some linguistic modernisation, one formula has probably been altered, pp. 409-10, 528-9
  • S 1159. Comments, slightly modernised copy of authentic writ, pp. 412-13, 529
  • S 1160. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 413-14, 529
  • S 1161. Comments, authentic, pp. 415-18, 529-31
  • S 1163. Comments, authentic, pp. 275-7, 490-1
  • S 1165. Comments, p. 202
  • S 1221. Comments, impossible witnesses for ostensible date, p. 576
  • S 1223. Comments, possibly authentic basis, p. 37 and n. 1
  • S 1226. Comments, p. 215
  • S 1240. Comments, authenticity reasonably certain, pp. 274, 490
  • S 1241. Comments, authenticity reasonably certain, pp. 274-5, 491
  • S 1242. Comments, authentic, pp. 380, 524-5
  • S 1243. Comments, based on authentic material, pp. 419-23, 531-6
  • S 1293. Comments, spurious, p. 338 and n. 2
  • S 1383. Comments, authentic, pp. 266-9, 482-6
  • S 1386. Comments, authentic, pp. 171, 448-9
  • S 1392. Comments, p. 574
  • S 1398. Comments, probably spurious, p. 37 and n. 1
  • S 1404. Comments, probably authentic, likely to be translation of English writ, pp. 122-3, 427-8
  • S 1422. Comments, pp. 482, 485-6
  • S 1427. Comments, authentic, pp. 133-4, 429-31
  • S 1428. Comments, spurious, pp. 387-95, 527
  • S 1428b. Comments, on a formula, p. 27
  • S 1454. Comments, pp. 47, 541 (no. 1)
  • S 1456. Comments, pp. 46-7, 541
  • S 1458. Comments, on dispute-settlement at shire-court, p. 46
  • S 1460. Comments, on background, dates 1023, pp. 40-1
  • S 1471. Comments, not earlier than 26 Dec. 1045, p. 51
  • S 1477. Comments, not authentic in present form but may ultimately be based on a genuine document, p. 205 n. 1
  • S 1478. Comments, probably drawn up not long after the event, p. 247 n. 2
  • S 1481a. Comments, based on authentic material, pp. 253-6
  • S 456. Printed, ex Fowler, p. 537
  • S 945. Printed, no. 52
  • S 946. Printed, no. 107
  • S 985. Printed, no. 26
  • S 986. Printed, no. 28
  • S 987. Printed, no. 29
  • S 988. Printed, no. 30
  • S 989. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 36
  • S 990. Printed, ex MS 7, no. 37
  • S 991. Printed, ex MS 1, no. 48
  • S 992. Printed, ex Dugdale, no. 53
  • S 996. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 56
  • S 997. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 57
  • S 1028. Printed, ex MS 1, pp. 538-9
  • S 1063. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 1 (p. 120)
  • S 1064. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 2 (p. 121)
  • S 1065. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 4 (pp. 131-2)
  • S 1066. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 5 (p. 132)
  • S 1067. Printed Translated, ex MS 4, no. 7 (p. 137)
  • S 1068. Printed Translated, ex MSS 2, 5, no. 8 (pp. 154-5)
  • S 1069. Printed Translated, ex MS 6, no. 9 (pp. 154-5)
  • S 1070. Printed Translated, no. 10 (p. 155)
  • S 1071. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 11 (p. 156)
  • S 1072. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 12 (p. 156)
  • S 1073. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 13 (p. 157)
  • S 1074. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 14 (p. 158)
  • S 1075. Printed Translated, ex MS 6, no. 15 (p. 158)
  • S 1076. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 16 (p. 159)
  • S 1077. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 17 (p. 159)
  • S 1078. Printed Translated, ex MSS 1, 4, no. 18 (p. 160)
  • S 1079. Printed Translated, ex MS 4, no. 19 (p. 161)
  • S 1080. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 20 (p. 162)
  • S 1081. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 21 (p. 162)
  • S 1082. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 22 (p. 163)
  • S 1083. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 23 (pp. 163-4)
  • S 1084. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 24 (pp. 164-5)
  • S 1085. Printed Translated, ex MS 7, no. 25 (p. 165)
  • S 1086. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 31 (p. 185)
  • S 1087. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 32 (pp. 185-6)
  • S 1088. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 33 (p. 186)
  • S 1089. Printed Translated, ex MSS 9, 11, no. 34 (p. 187)
  • S 1090. Printed Translated, ex MSS 1, 4, no. 35 (p. 189)
  • S 1091. Printed Translated, ex MSS 5, 9, no. 38 (p. 199)
  • S 1092. Printed Translated, ex MS 5 etc., no. 39 (p. 200)
  • S 1093. Printed Translated, no. 40 (p. 208)
  • S 1094. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 41 (p. 209)
  • S 1095. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 42 (p. 210)
  • S 1096. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 43 (p. 211)
  • S 1097. Printed Translated, no. 44 (p. 214)
  • S 1098. Printed Translated, ex MSS 1, 2, no. 45 (pp. 219-21)
  • S 1099. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 46 (p. 222)
  • S 1100. Printed Translated, ex MSS 4, 7, no. 47 (pp. 224-5)
  • S 1101. Printed, no. 49 (p. 230)
  • S 1102. Printed, no. 50 (p. 231)
  • S 1103. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 51 (pp. 234-5)
  • S 1104. Printed Translated, ex Dugdale, no. 54 (p. 242)
  • S 1105. Printed Translated, no. 55 (p. 245)
  • S 1106. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 58 (pp. 257-8)
  • S 1107. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 59 (p. 258)
  • S 1108. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 60 (pp. 258-9)
  • S 1109. Printed, ex MSS 6, 15, no. 61 (pp. 259-61)
  • S 1110. Printed, ex MSS 6, 15, no. 62 (pp. 262-4)+C4902
  • S 1111. Printed Translated, no. 64 (p. 277)
  • S 1112. Printed Translated, no. 65 (pp. 278-9)
  • S 1113. Printed Translated, no. 66 (p. 280)
  • S 1114. Printed Translated, no. 67 (pp. 280-1)
  • S 1115. Printed Translated, no. 68 (p. 281)
  • S 1116. Printed Translated, no. 69 (pp. 282-3)
  • S 1117. Printed Translated, ex Madox, no. 73 (p. 340)
  • S 1118. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 74 (p. 341)
  • S 1119. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 75 (p. 342)
  • S 1120. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 76 (p. 343)
  • S 1121. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 77 (p. 344)
  • S 1122. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 78 (p. 345)
  • S 1123. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 79 (p. 346)
  • S 1124. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 80 (p. 347)
  • S 1125. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 81 (p. 348)
  • S 1126. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 82 (pp. 348-9)
  • S 1127. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 83 (p. 349)
  • S 1128. Printed Translated, no. 84 (p. 350)
  • S 1129. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 85 (pp. 351-2)
  • S 1130. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 86 (p. 353)
  • S 1131. Printed Translated, no. 87 (p. 353)
  • S 1132. Printed Translated, no. 88 (p. 354)
  • S 1133. Printed Translated, no. 89 (pp. 354-5)
  • S 1134. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 90 (p. 355)
  • S 1135. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 91 (p. 356)
  • S 1136. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 92
  • S 1137. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 93 (p. 358)
  • S 1138. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 94 (p. 359)
  • S 1139. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 95 (no. 360)
  • S 1140. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 96 (pp. 360-1)
  • S 1141. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 97 (p. 361)
  • S 1142. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 98 (p. 362)
  • S 1143. Printed Translated, no. 99 (p. 364)
  • S 1144. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 100 (pp. 364-5)
  • S 1145. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 101 (pp. 365-6)
  • S 1146. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 102 (pp. 366-7)
  • S 1147. Printed Translated, no. 103 (p. 368)
  • S 1148. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 104 (pp. 368-9)
  • S 1149. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 105 (p. 370)
  • S 1150. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 106 (pp. 371-2)
  • S 1151. Printed Translated, no. 109 (p. 397)
  • S 1152. Printed, ex MS 1, no. 110 (p. 398)
  • S 1153. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 111 (p. 399)
  • S 1154. Printed Translated, no. 112 (p. 400)
  • S 1155. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 114 (p. 407)
  • S 1156. Printed Translated, no. 115 (pp. 410-11)
  • S 1157. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 116 (p. 411)
  • S 1158. Printed Translated, no. 117 (p. 412)
  • S 1159. Printed Translated, ex MS 1, no. 118 (p. 418)
  • S 1160. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 119 (p. 418)
  • S 1161. Printed Translated, no. 120 (p. 419)
  • S 1163. Printed Translated, no. 71 (pp. 284-5)
  • S 1240. Printed Translated, no. 70 (pp. 283-4)
  • S 1241. Printed Translated, no. 72 (pp. 285-6)
  • S 1242. Printed Translated, no. 108 (p. 396)
  • S 1243. Printed Translated, no. 121 (pp. 423-4)
  • S 1383. Printed Translated, no. 63
  • S 1386. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 27 (pp. 182-3)
  • S 1404. Printed, no. 3
  • S 1427. Printed Translated, no. 6 (pp. 134-5)
  • S 1428. Printed Translated, ex MS 2, no. 113 (pp. 401-2)
  • S 1648. Comments, citing Whitelock, probably authentic, p. 457