Search Results

You searched for:
Label: Darlington 1955

Results: 1-1 of 1

Show all data

  • Metadata

    Darlington 1955. Darlington, R. R., 'Anglo-Saxon Wiltshire', in Victoria County History of Wiltshire (London, 1955), pp. 1–34. 141 charters cited.

    • S 71. Comments, p. 3
    • S 73. Comments, p. 3
    • S 96. Comments, accepts Wallenberg's suggestion, p. 5 n. 24
    • S 149. Comments, authentic basis possible, p. 5
    • S 229. Comments, spurious, p. 84
    • S 231. Comments, dubious with genuine elements, pp. 4, 89-90
    • S 234. Comments, spurious but with genuine elements, pp. 4, 90
    • S 243. Comments, possibly genuine, pp. 4, 89
    • S 256. Comments, questionable authenticity, pp. 4 n. 23, 90
    • S 260. Comments, pp. 5, 89
    • S 264. Comments, p. 5
    • S 275. Comments, p. 84
    • S 294b. Comments, 'presumably a forgery', p. 90
    • S 301. Comments, may be based on authentic material, p. 88
    • S 305. Comments, spurious, p. 89
    • S 306. Comments, spurious in present form, p. 90
    • S 312. Comments, spurious, p. 85
    • S 313. Comments, spurious, pp. 7, 85
    • S 320. Comments, p. 90
    • S 326. Comments, p. 95
    • S 336. Comments, pp. 7, 87
    • S 341. Comments, probably refers to West Monkton, pp. 7, 96
    • S 341. Comments, probably refers to West Monkton, pp. 7, 96
    • S 348. Comments, spurious, p. 91
    • S 357. Comments, p. 95
    • S 359. Comments, p. 86
    • S 362. Comments, pp. 7, 86
    • S 363. Comments, p. 89
    • S 364. Comments, p. 92
    • S 366. Comments, dubious, p. 94
    • S 368. Comments, on bounds, authentic, pp. 10, 91
    • S 369. Comments, authentic, p. 91
    • S 370. Comments, p. 94
    • S 393. Comments, possibly genuine, p. 84
    • S 415. Comments, suggests Sumerford was Little Somerford, Wilts, p. 88
    • S 416. Comments, contemporary, p. 85
    • S 424. Comments, pp. 30, 91
    • S 426. Comments, p. 96
    • S 434. Comments, p. 89
    • S 435. Comments, p. 90
    • S 438. Comments, pp. 30, 92
    • S 449. Comments, contemporary, p. 85
    • S 458. Comments, p. 91
    • S 459. Comments, p. 95
    • S 466. Comments, defended, p. 96
    • S 468. Comments, p. 91
    • S 469. Comments, pp. 16, 93
    • S 470. Comments, contemporary, p. 94
    • S 472. Comments, p. 96
    • S 473. Comments, p. 96
    • S 492. Comments, p. 92
    • S 493. Comments, p. 92
    • S 504. Comments, p. 96
    • S 513. Comments, imperfect but probably authentic, p. 96
    • S 522. Comments, p. 84
    • S 530. Comments, p. 96
    • S 540. Comments, p. 84
    • S 541. Comments, p. 96
    • S 543. Comments, queries Laverstock identification, p. 93
    • S 547. Comments, p. 85
    • S 568. Comments, p. 96
    • S 580. Comments, p. 97
    • S 582. Comments, pp. 81, 91
    • S 585. Comments, p. 85
    • S 586. Comments, tentatively assigns to Wilton parish, p. 92
    • S 612. Comments, p. 93
    • S 629. Comments, p. 88
    • S 630. Comments, p. 95
    • S 631. Comments, cited, p. 92
    • S 635. Comments, p. 84
    • S 637. Comments, p. 78
    • S 640. Comments, p. 84
    • S 642. Comments, p. 93
    • S 647. Comments, pp. 10, 91
    • S 666. Comments, p. 91
    • S 668. Comments, on identification, p. 13
    • S 685. Comments, on bounds, p. 10 n. 51
    • S 688. Comments, p. 97
    • S 696. Comments, p. 84
    • S 697. Comments, p. 86 n. 52
    • S 705. Comments, p. 87
    • S 706. Comments, pp. 12, 92
    • S 707. Comments, p. 97
    • S 715. Comments, p. 85 n. 37
    • S 719. Comments, pp. 12, 92
    • S 726. Comments, p. 28
    • S 727. Comments, p. 93
    • S 730. Comments, p. 95
    • S 756. Comments, possibly authentic, p. 97
    • S 765. Comments, p. 93
    • S 766. Comments, on estates, pp. 92-3
    • S 767. Comments, authentic, pp. 16, 92
    • S 775. Comments, p. 96
    • S 784. Comments, p. 91
    • S 789. Comments, p. 92
    • S 796. Comments, p. 89
    • S 806. Comments, p. 86
    • S 831. Comments, pp. 8, 86, 93
    • S 841. Comments, p. 89
    • S 846. Comments, p. 86
    • S 848. Comments, p. 86
    • S 850. Comments, p. 94
    • S 861. Comments, p. 84
    • S 867. Comments, p. 85
    • S 868. Comments, p. 86
    • S 870. Comments, pp. 16, 28
    • S 881. Comments, may be based on authentic material, p. 92
    • S 891. Comments, pp. 8, 84
    • S 899. Comments, authenticity defended, pp. 31 and n., 95
    • S 918. Comments, pp. 16, 87
    • S 937. Comments, p. 97
    • S 993. Comments, p. 67
    • S 999. Comments, p. 65
    • S 1010. Comments, pp. 80, 92
    • S 1036. Comments, spurious, pp. 86-7
    • S 1038. Comments, doubtful, pp. 87-90
    • S 1164. Comments, p. 25
    • S 1166. Comments, p. 3
    • S 1169. Comments, p. 90
    • S 1170. Comments, pp. 4, 90
    • S 1205. Comments, p. 89
    • S 1208. Comments, p. 27
    • S 1221. Comments, p. 29
    • S 1256. Comments, p. 25
    • S 1263. Comments, possibly based on a memorandum, p. 86 and n. 56
    • S 1284. Comments, p. 86
    • S 1285. Comments, pp. 14, 84
    • S 1286. Comments, suggests that the land æt Stoce has been absorbed into Bedwyn and is represented by Stokke House, pp. 86-7
    • S 1376. Comments, p. 86
    • S 1396. Comments, p. 68
    • S 1417. Comments, contemporary, p. 94
    • S 1485. Comments, pp. 68, 85
    • S 1494. Comments, p. 95
    • S 1504. Comments, p. 86
    • S 1505. Comments, p. 94
    • S 1507. Comments, pp. 31, 87
    • S 1513. Comments, p. 85
    • S 1515. Comments, pp. 30, 84, 86, 93, 96
    • S 1533. Comments, pp. 85, 87, 94
    • S 1539. Comments, pp. 68, 84
    • S 1811. Comments, p. 93