Show all data

• Metadata

  Kelly, Abingdon. Kelly, S. E., ed., The Charters of Abingdon Abbey, Anglo-Saxon Charters, 2 vols (Oxford, 2000–2001), 7 and 8. 321 charters cited.

  • S 93. Comments, spurious, but forger has used some contemporary records., no. 5
  • S 166. Comments, spurious, although forger has made use of some early documentation, no. 8
  • S 183. Comments, spurious in present form but may be based on genuine 9th-century privilege, no. 9
  • S 184. Comments, fabrication, probably of early 13th century, based in part on S 268 and S 460, no. 10
  • S 202. Comments, spurious, a forgery based on a West Saxon charter of 842, no. 13
  • S 225. Comments, authentic, but date miscopied, probably refers to Farnborough, Warwicks, no. 20
  • S 239. Comments, fabrication largely based on genuine early charter, no. 2
  • S 241. Comments, spurious, incorporates material from early non-Abingdon sources, no. 4
  • S 252. Comments, fabrication using early material, no. 1
  • S 268. Comments, probably authentic, no. 7
  • S 269. Comments, authentic, no. 6
  • S 278. Comments, spurious, forger has used some contemporary records, no. 11
  • S 302. Comments, abbreviated version of privilege such as S 303-5, 307-8, with section on specific application omitted, no. 14
  • S 335. Comments, probably authentic, no. 15
  • S 338a. Comments, authentic. The donor's name was spelled Æ∂ered, leading to confusion with King Eadred. The date was altered in the MS by a later revisor, no. 16
  • S 355. Comments, authentic basis, but probably reworked at Abingdon in the late 10th or 11th century, no. 18
  • S 369. Comments, authentic, no. 19
  • S 392. Comments, on identification, pp. 000-000
  • S 396. Comments, authentic, no. 21
  • S 404. Comments, a difficult text with an impossible witness-list, but unlikely to be an outright forgery. Cynath was abbot of Evesham, not Abingdon, and the formulation fits into a recognisable West Mercian diplomatic tradition, no. 22
  • S 408. Comments, spurious, no. 27
  • S 409. Comments, spurious, no. 25
  • S 410. Comments, spurious, no. 26
  • S 411. Comments, fundamentally authentic, MS 1 may have been later copy and not an original, no. 29
  • S 413. Comments, authentic, no. 23
  • S 448. Comments, authentic, no. 30
  • S 460. Comments, authentic, no. 31
  • S 461. Comments, authentic, no. 32
  • S 471. Comments, probably authentic, witness-list is incompatible with 940 but there are close diplomatic links with three diplomas of 943 (S 486, 487, 492), and it seems possible that a copyist misread the last three minims of .dccccxliii. as in[dictione]; this would explain why no numeral is given for the indiction. The beneficiary is Wulfric Cufing, no. 33
  • S 480. Comments, fundamentally authentic but reference to Appleton is probably an addition, intended to define the part of the larger district known as Ærmundesleah to which the charter referred, no. 34
  • S 482. Comments, authentic, references to Swinley occur only in MS 1 and were probably added to define the portion of the Winkfield area to which the charter referred, no. 35
  • S 491. Comments, authentic, no. 37
  • S 494. Comments, authentic, no. 38
  • S 496. Comments, probably authentic, not clear whether date should be 942 or 944, no. 36
  • S 500. Comments, authentic, no. 39
  • S 525. Comments, authentic, no. 40
  • S 529. Comments, authentic, no. 41
  • S 542. Comments, authentic, no. 42
  • S 544. Comments, authentic, no. 43
  • S 552. Comments, original, no. 44
  • S 558. Comments, authentic, no. 45
  • S 559. Comments, probably a fabrication, formulation points to 960s or later, MS 1 unlikely to have been contemporary, witness-list from a charter of 953 x 955, no. 47
  • S 560. Comments, authentic, no. 49
  • S 561. Comments, authentic, no. 48
  • S 564. Comments, authentic, no. 50
  • S 567. Comments, probably spurious, no. 51
  • S 577. Comments, authentic basis, no. 77
  • S 578. Comments, authentic., no. 46
  • S 581. Comments, probably authentic, indiction correct for 956, no. 53
  • S 583. Comments, authenticity uncertain, probably spurious, no. 58
  • S 584. Comments, forged to give clear title to the whole Tadmarton manor, which was otherwise covered by three separate charters in favour of laymen (S 611, 617, 618). The bounds of these charters were included in S 584 without modification, no. 68
  • S 587. Comments, probably authentic, although MS 1 not contemporary, no. 70
  • S 588. Comments, authentic, no. 71
  • S 590. Comments, authentic, no. 60
  • S 591. Comments, authentic, no. 72
  • S 594. Comments, MS 1 probably original, no. 54
  • S 597. Comments, probably authentic, although versions of the text in MSS 1, 2 are very different and it is difficult to decide priority, no. 55
  • S 603. Comments, authentic, no. 61
  • S 605. Comments, authenticity uncertain, in MSS 3 and 4 the date is 955, no. 53
  • S 607. Comments, probably authentic, no. 57
  • S 611. Comments, authentic, no. 73
  • S 614. Comments, authentic, no. 56
  • S 615. Comments, authentic, no. 62
  • S 617. Comments, authentic, no. 67
  • S 618. Comments, original, no. 66
  • S 620. Comments, authentic, charter is duplicated in the cartulary without significant variants, no. 74
  • S 621. Comments, authentic, no. 63
  • S 622. Comments, authentic, no. 64
  • S 624. Comments, MS 1 original, no. 65
  • S 634. Comments, authentic, no. 69
  • S 638. Comments, probably authentic, dating clause likely to be unreliable, no. 75
  • S 639. Comments, probably authentic, dating clause likely to be unreliable, no. 75
  • S 650. Comments, authentic, no. 78
  • S 651. Comments, authentic, no. 79
  • S 654. Comments, authentic, no. 80
  • S 657. Comments, authentic, no. 81
  • S 658. Comments, almost certainly authentic, no. 83
  • S 663. Comments, probably authentic, no. 59
  • S 665. Comments, version of S 491 with the donor's name altered, perhaps forged in 11th century, cf. no. 37
  • S 673. Comments, more likely than not to be authentic, no. 84
  • S 678. Comments, authentic, no. 82
  • S 682. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 85
  • S 687. Comments, original., no. 86
  • S 688. Comments, authenticity uncertain, perhaps a forgery based on S 690, no. 88
  • S 689. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 89
  • S 690. Comments, original, probably drafted and written at Abingdon, no. 87
  • S 691. Comments, authentic, no. 90
  • S 698. Comments, authentic, estate may have been in Oxon, no. 91
  • S 700. Comments, authentic, no. 92
  • S 701. Comments, authenticity uncertain, the formulation is acceptable but the details of the grant seem suspicious, no. 93
  • S 705. Comments, authentic, no. 94
  • S 708. Comments, probably authentic., no. 96
  • S 713. Comments, authentic, no. 97
  • S 714. Comments, authentic, no. 98
  • S 722. Comments, authentic, no. 99
  • S 724. Comments, probably authentic, no. 100
  • S 725. Comments, diplomatically unconventional, but probably authentic, no. 101
  • S 729. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 000-000
  • S 732. Comments, suspicious, drawn up at Abingdon, no. 103
  • S 733. Comments, suspicious, probably drawn up at Abingdon, no. 104
  • S 734. Comments, suspicious, probably drawn up at Abingdon, no. 104
  • S 737. Comments, authentic, no. 105
  • S 750. Comments, authentic, not modelled on S 726 (as suggested by Whitelock), no. 106
  • S 756. Comments, spurious, probably modelled on S 673 and originally dated 958 (as in MS 2), no. 10
  • S 757. Comments, evidently drawn up at Abingdon, authenticity uncertain, no. 111
  • S 758. Comments, evidently drawn up at Abingdon, authenticity uncertain, no. 110
  • S 759. Comments, evidently drawn up at Abingdon, authenticity uncertain, no. 112
  • S 760. Comments, evidently drawn up at Abingdon, authenticity uncertain, no. 113
  • S 761. Comments, dubious as it stands, but may be based on an authentic document and record a genuine transaction, no. 107
  • S 769. Comments, probably authentic, perhaps an example of local drafting, no. 109
  • S 778. Comments, authentic, probably refers to Kingston Bagpuize, no. 114
  • S 786. Comments, most likely to be authentic and original, pp. cvi-cxi
  • S 812. Comments, substantially authentic, pp. 000-000
  • S 828. Comments, may be contemporary document drawn up at Abingdon, no. 117
  • S 829. Comments, may be a contemporary document draw up at Abingdon, no. 116
  • S 833. Comments, dubious, Æthelred's name substituted for Edgar's, woodland may have been in the vicinity of Claydons in Alveston, no. 95
  • S 838. Comments, no good reason to question authenticity, pp. 000-000
  • S 839. Comments, authentic, no. 118
  • S 843. Comments, probably authentic, no. 119
  • S 851. Comments, authentic, no. 120
  • S 852. Comments, authentic, no. 121
  • S 855. Comments, authentic, no. 122
  • S 858. Comments, authentic, no. 123
  • S 876. Comments, MS 1 seems contemporary or nearly contemporary, charter was probably drawn up at Abingdon with the king's permission, no. 124
  • S 880. Comments, on production, pp. 000-000
  • S 883. Comments, authentic, no. 125
  • S 886. Comments, authentic, no. 126
  • S 887. Comments, authentic, no. 127
  • S 896. Comments, probably authentic, no. 128
  • S 897. Comments, probably spurious, no. 130
  • S 901. Comments, authentic, no. 132
  • S 902. Comments, authentic, no. 131
  • S 915. Comments, authentic, no. 134
  • S 918. Comments, suspicious, no. 135
  • S 927. Comments, authenticity uncertain, the problems of the witness-list are not insuperable and there are no other suspicious features, no. 136
  • S 934. Comments, authentic, no. 137
  • S 937. Comments, probably authentic, no. 129
  • S 964. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 138
  • S 967. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 139
  • S 973. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 140
  • S 993. Comments, authenticity uncertain, possibly a contemporary Abingdon product, no. 141
  • S 999. Comments, probably authentic, perhaps drawn up at Abingdon, no. 142
  • S 1020. Comments, probably a very early forgery, no. 145
  • S 1022. Comments, authentic, no. 144
  • S 1023. Comments, spurious, no. 146
  • S 1025. Comments, spurious, no. 147
  • S 1065. Comments, authenticity uncertain, no. 148
  • S 1066. Comments, deeply suspicious, no. 149
  • S 1179. Comments, authentic basis, details of land granted probably altered, no. 3
  • S 1201. Comments, authentic, no. 17
  • S 1208. Comments, spurious, no. 28
  • S 1216. Comments, authentic, identification with Kingston Bagpuize preferable, no. 115
  • S 1271. Comments, authentic basis, but abbreviated and perhaps composite, no. 12
  • S 1292. Comments, authentic, no. 76
  • S 1404. Comments, translation of authentic document, cf. Stevenson, Chron. Abingdon, i. 457-9, 475 for the context of the dispute, no. 143
  • S 1488. Comments, authentic, no. 133
  • S 1540. Comments, no. 150
  • S 1544. Comments, no. 117A
  • S 1545. Comments, survey probably did not form an original part of S 1201. It may have been an addition to that charter, or it may derive from another diploma for Lockinge that does not survive, no. 17A
  • S 1546. Comments, no. 25A
  • S 1567. Comments, no. 31A
  • S 1569. Comments, no. 151
  • S 1572a. Comments, short version of bounds in S 967, probably from S 973, no. 140A
  • S 1574. Comments, variant of survey in S 588, no. 71A
  • S 93. Printed, no. 5
  • S 166. Printed, no. 8
  • S 183. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, no. 9
  • S 184. Printed, ex MS 2, no. 10
  • S 202. Printed, no. 13
  • S 225. Printed, no. 20
  • S 239. Printed, no. 2
  • S 241. Printed, ex MSS 1, 2, no. 4
  • S 252. Printed, no. 1
  • S 268. Printed, no. 7
  • S 269. Printed, no. 6
  • S 278. Printed, no. 11
  • S 302. Printed, no. 14
  • S 335. Printed, no. 15
  • S 338a. Printed, no. 16
  • S 355. Printed, no. 18
  • S 369. Printed, no. 19
  • S 396. Printed, no. 21
  • S 404. Printed, no. 22
  • S 408. Printed, no. 27
  • S 409. Printed, no. 25
  • S 410. Printed, no. 26
  • S 411. Printed, no. 29
  • S 413. Printed, no. 23
  • S 448. Printed, no. 30
  • S 460. Printed, no. 31
  • S 461. Printed, no. 32
  • S 471. Printed, no. 33
  • S 480. Printed, no. 34
  • S 482. Printed, no. 35
  • S 491. Printed, no. 37
  • S 494. Printed, no. 38
  • S 496. Printed, no. 36
  • S 500. Printed, no. 39
  • S 525. Printed, no. 40
  • S 529. Printed, no. 41
  • S 542. Printed, no. 42
  • S 544. Printed, no. 43
  • S 552. Printed, no. 44
  • S 558. Printed, no. 45
  • S 559. Printed, no. 47
  • S 560. Printed, no. 49
  • S 561. Printed, no. 48
  • S 564. Printed, no. 50
  • S 567. Printed, no. 51
  • S 577. Printed, no. 77
  • S 578. Printed, no. 46
  • S 581. Printed, no. 53
  • S 583. Printed, no. 58
  • S 584. Printed, no. 68
  • S 587. Printed, no. 70
  • S 588. Printed, no. 71
  • S 590. Printed, no. 60
  • S 591. Printed, no. 72
  • S 594. Printed, no. 54
  • S 597. Printed, no. 55
  • S 603. Printed, no. 61
  • S 605. Printed, no. 52
  • S 607. Printed, no. 57
  • S 611. Printed, no. 73
  • S 614. Printed, no. 56
  • S 615. Printed, no. 62
  • S 617. Printed, no. 67
  • S 618. Printed, no. 66
  • S 620. Printed, no. 74
  • S 621. Printed, no. 63
  • S 622. Printed, no. 64
  • S 624. Printed, no. 65
  • S 634. Printed, no. 69
  • S 639. Printed, no. 75
  • S 650. Printed, no. 78
  • S 651. Printed, no. 79
  • S 654. Printed, no. 80
  • S 657. Printed, no. 81
  • S 658. Printed, no. 83
  • S 663. Printed, no. 59
  • S 665. Printed, cf. no. 37
  • S 673. Printed, no. 84
  • S 678. Printed, no. 82
  • S 682. Printed, no. 85
  • S 687. Printed, no. 86
  • S 688. Printed, no. 88
  • S 689. Printed, no. 89
  • S 690. Printed, no. 87
  • S 691. Printed, no. 90
  • S 698. Printed, no. 91
  • S 700. Printed, no. 92
  • S 701. Printed, no. 93
  • S 705. Printed, no. 94
  • S 708. Printed, no. 96
  • S 713. Printed, no. 97
  • S 714. Printed, no. 98
  • S 722. Printed, no. 99
  • S 724. Printed, no. 100
  • S 725. Printed, no. 101
  • S 732. Printed, no. 103
  • S 733. Printed, no. 104
  • S 734. Printed, no. 102
  • S 737. Printed, no. 105
  • S 750. Printed, no. 106
  • S 756. Printed, no. 108
  • S 757. Printed, no. 111
  • S 758. Printed, no. 110
  • S 759. Printed, no. 112
  • S 760. Printed, no. 113
  • S 761. Printed, no. 107
  • S 769. Printed, no. 109
  • S 778. Printed, no. 114
  • S 828. Printed, no. 117
  • S 829. Printed, no. 116
  • S 833. Printed, no. 95
  • S 839. Printed, no. 118
  • S 843. Printed, no. 119
  • S 851. Printed, no. 120
  • S 852. Printed, no. 121
  • S 855. Printed, no. 122
  • S 858. Printed, no. 123
  • S 876. Printed, no. 124
  • S 883. Printed, no. 125
  • S 886. Printed, no. 126
  • S 887. Printed, no. 127
  • S 896. Printed, no. 128
  • S 897. Printed, no. 130
  • S 901. Printed, no. 132
  • S 902. Printed, no. 131
  • S 915. Printed, no. 134
  • S 918. Printed, no. 135
  • S 927. Printed, no. 136
  • S 934. Printed, no. 137
  • S 937. Printed, no. 129
  • S 964. Printed, no. 138
  • S 967. Printed, no. 139
  • S 973. Printed, no. 140
  • S 993. Printed, no. 141
  • S 999. Printed, no. 142
  • S 1020. Printed, no. 145
  • S 1022. Printed, no. 144
  • S 1023. Printed, no. 146
  • S 1025. Printed, no. 147
  • S 1065. Printed, no. 148
  • S 1066. Printed, no. 149
  • S 1179. Printed, no. 3
  • S 1201. Printed, no. 17
  • S 1208. Printed, no. 28
  • S 1216. Printed, English version, no. 115
  • S 1271. Printed, no. 12
  • S 1292. Printed, no. 76
  • S 1404. Printed, no. 143
  • S 1488. Printed Translated, English version, no. 133
  • S 1540. Printed, no. 150
  • S 1544. Printed, no. 117A
  • S 1545. Printed, no. 17A
  • S 1546. Printed, no. 25A
  • S 1567. Printed, no. 31A
  • S 1569. Printed, no. 151
  • S 1572a. Printed, no. 140A
  • S 1574. Printed, no. 71A