Show all data

• Metadata

  Keynes 1980. Keynes, S., The Diplomas of King Æthelred ‘the Unready’ 978–1016: a Study in their Use as Historical Evidence, Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, 3rd series (Cambridge, 1980), 13. 518 charters cited.

  • S 93. Comments, spurious, p. 11 n. 14
  • S 112. Comments, spurious, perhaps based in part on Ev 2 (S 1664), p. 110 n. 80
  • S 183. Comments, spurious, p. 11 n. 14
  • S 190. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 52
  • S 222. Comments, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 225. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 226. Comments, forgery, p. 86 n. 9
  • S 230. Comments, 10th-century forgery, p. 64 n. 116
  • S 241. Comments, spurious, p. 11 n. 14
  • S 277. Comments, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 278. Comments, spurious, p. 11 n. 14
  • S 294. Comments, spurious, p. 114 n. 103
  • S 294a. Comments, spurious, p. 114 n. 103
  • S 294b. Comments, spurious, p. 114 n. 103
  • S 298. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 51
  • S 302. Comments, spurious, p. 11 n. 14
  • S 343. Comments, spurious, elements of dispositive section recur in S 921, p. 125 n. 135
  • S 348. Comments, on witness-list, p. 158 n. 15
  • S 351. Comments, forgery based on a genuine charter of King Athelstan, p. 44 n. 81
  • S 358. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 360. Comments, probably forged at same time as S 370, 648, p. 112 n. 85
  • S 361. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 367. Comments, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 368. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 369. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 370. Comments, probably forged at same time as S 360, 648, p. 112 n. 85
  • S 371. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 378. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 379. Comments, on details of formulation, pp. 35 n. 62, 44 n. 77
  • S 392. Comments, on alliterative charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 393. Comments, spurious, witness-list identical with that in S 418, p. 43 n. 75
  • S 395. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 396. Comments, pp. 32 n. 52, 42-3
  • S 397. Comments, pp. 32 n. 52, 42-3
  • S 399. Comments, 'Æthelstan A' charter, pp. 41 n. 71, 43
  • S 400. Comments, pp. 41 n. 71, 43
  • S 401. Comments, spurious, p. 75 n. 150
  • S 403. Comments, p. 43 n. 74
  • S 404. Comments, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 405. Comments, not authentic in its received form, p. 43 n. 74
  • S 407. Comments, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 408. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 409. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 410. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 411. Comments, belongs to 935 x 939; on chrismon, pp. 44 n. 80, 68 n. 129
  • S 412. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 413. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 416. Comments, original, written by 'Æthelstan A', probably a royal scribe, pp. 16, 21 n. 21, 25, 44
  • S 417. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 418. Comments, pp. 41 n. 71, 43, 44 n. 77
  • S 419. Comments, on formulation, pp. 41 n. 71, 43, 44 n. 77
  • S 421. Comments, cited, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 422. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 423. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 425. Comments, original, product of 'Æthelstan A', probably written by a royal scribe, pp. 16, 21, 44
  • S 426. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 429. Comments, p. 44 n. 80
  • S 430. Comments, pp. 33 n. 54, 44 n. 80
  • S 431. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 80
  • S 433. Comments, forgery of mid 11th-century, diplomatic links with S 591, p. 66 n. 123
  • S 434. Comments, spurious, probably based on an authentic diploma issued in 935, cf. S 435, 436, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 435. Comments, spurious, probably based on an authentic charter issued in 935, cf. S 434, 436, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 436. Comments, spurious, probably based on an authentic charter issued in 935, cf. S 434, 435, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 437. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 80
  • S 438. Comments, on rubric; on formulation, p. 24 n. 33, 44 n. 80
  • S 441. Comments, on rubric; on formulation, pp. 24 n. 33, 44 n. 81
  • S 442. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 81
  • S 445. Comments, p. 44 n. 80
  • S 446. Comments, on rubric, on witness-list, pp. 24 n. 33, 43 n. 76, 44 n. 80
  • S 447. Comments, original, product of 'Æthelstan C', pp. 16, 24, 43, 45
  • S 448. Comments, on witness-list, pp. 43-4 n. 76, 44 n. 81
  • S 449. Comments, original, scribe was colleague of 'Æthelstan C', pp. 24, 43, 45
  • S 458. Comments, p. 44 n. 78
  • S 459. Comments, p. 44 n. 81
  • S 460. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 461. Comments, on witness-list, pp. 44-5
  • S 462. Comments, takes beneficiary to be Ælfswith, pp. 44-5
  • S 463. Comments, on rubric; on formulation, pp. 24 n. 33, 45
  • S 464. Comments, original, product of 'Æthelstan C', pp. 16, 24 n. 33, 45
  • S 465. Comments, treats as authentic, witness-list based on same memorandum as that of S 470, p. 45 n. 82
  • S 466. Comments, on formulation, p. 44 n. 81
  • S 467. Comments, pp. 24 n. 33, 33 n. 54
  • S 468. Comments, on rubric; on formulation, pp. 24 n. 33, 44 n. 81
  • S 469. Comments, on formulation, p. 32 n. 53, 44 n. 81
  • S 470. Comments, original, witness-list based on same memorandum as that in S 465, pp. 24 n. 33, 44 n. 81, 45 n. 82
  • S 472. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 473. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 474. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 124
  • S 475. Comments, on formulation, cf. S 440, the grant of the same estate to the same beneficiary, p. 66 n. 124
  • S 479. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 481. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 124
  • S 484. Comments, on charter-type, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 488. Comments, on formulation, pp. 32 n. 53, 66 n. 124
  • S 492. Comments, on rubric, p. 24 n. 33
  • S 495. Comments, MS 1 apparent original, pp. 24-5
  • S 496. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 497. Comments, original, product of 'Edmund C', p. 16
  • S 507. Comments, dubious, p. 143 n. 212
  • S 509. Comments, probably authentic; on formulation, pp. 27 n. 40, 48 n. 87
  • S 510. Comments, product of 'Edmund C', p. 16
  • S 512. Comments, original, written by 'Æthelstan C', pp. 16, 45
  • S 513. Comments, on nature of transaction, p. 33 n. 54
  • S 520. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 521. Comments, forgery, p. 103 n. 60
  • S 526. Comments, on transaction, p. 33 n. 54
  • S 528. Comments, product of 'Edmund C', p. 16
  • S 532. Comments, treats as authentic, p. 103 n. 60
  • S 535. Comments, original, product of 'Edmund C', record of payment seems to have been inserted as an afterthought, pp. 16, 33 n. 55
  • S 540. Comments, forgery, p. 103 n. 60
  • S 544. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 545. Comments, on notification formula, p. 112
  • S 546. Comments, probably not authentic, p. 27 n. 40
  • S 548. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 549. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 550. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 552. Comments, product of 'Edmund C', p. 16
  • S 554. Comments, on formulation; on chrismon, p. 17, 68 n. 129
  • S 555. Comments, probably authentic, pp. 27 n. 40, 48 n. 87
  • S 556. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 557. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 559. Comments, on chrismon, p. 68 n. 129
  • S 560. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 47-8
  • S 561. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 47-8
  • S 562. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 46-8
  • S 563. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 46-8
  • S 564. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 46-8
  • S 565. Comments, p. 33 n. 54
  • S 566. Comments, on charter-type, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 567. Comments, unlikely to be authentic, pp. 11 n. 16, 27 n. 40
  • S 568. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 46-8
  • S 569. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 570. Comments, on charter-type, pp. 46-8
  • S 571. Comments, not authentic, p. 48 nn. 89 & 90
  • S 572. Comments, on 'alliterative' charters, p. 82 n. 165
  • S 574. Comments, on charter-type, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 575. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 125
  • S 576. Comments, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 577. Comments, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 579. Comments, on formulation, p. 48 n. 85
  • S 581. Comments, anomalous witness-list, p. 62 n. 108
  • S 582. Comments, treats as authentic, discusses date, pp. 49-50
  • S 583. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 65
  • S 584. Comments, 'Group Three'; spurious, pp. 57-8, 68 n. 130, 75 n. 151
  • S 585. Comments, 'Group Three', pp. 57-8, 66
  • S 586. Comments, no conclusive argument against authenticity, p. 112
  • S 587. Comments, 'Group Four'; unlikely to be original, pp. 59-60, 66, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 128, 68-9 n. 133
  • S 588. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-60, 66, 68 n. 128
  • S 589. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 51-3
  • S 590. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 63-4
  • S 591. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-61, 66
  • S 592. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 64-5, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 128
  • S 593. Comments, cited, pp. 62 n. 108, 67 n. 127
  • S 594. Comments, Group One', pp. 51-3, 62 n. 110, 68
  • S 595. Comments, on formulation, pp. 62 n. 108, 65, 68 n. 128
  • S 596. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 65, 68 n. 128
  • S 597. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 49 n. 93, 51-3, 62 n. 110, 63 n. 111
  • S 598. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 65, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 128
  • S 599. Comments, truncated witness-list but may belong to 'Group Two', pp. 62 n. 108, 65, 68 nn. 128 & 131
  • S 600. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 64, 68 n. 128
  • S 601. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 64, 68 nn. 128 & 131
  • S 602. Comments, Group Four'; unlikely to be original, cf. S 646, pp. 59-60, 68-9 n. 133
  • S 603. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 65, 66, 68 n. 128
  • S 604. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 65, 66, 68 n. 128
  • S 605. Comments, witness-list points to date very early in 956, pp. 48 n. 89, 49-50, 53, 62 n. 108
  • S 606. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 63-4
  • S 607. Comments, 'Group Two'; may be spurious, but the witness-list is genuine, pp. 11 n. 16, 50, 54-6, 63-4, 56 n. 105
  • S 608. Comments, 'Group One', verbal parallels with S 594, pp. 52-3, 62 n. 110
  • S 609. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 65, 66 n. 125, 67 n. 127
  • S 610. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-60, 66, 67 n. 127
  • S 611. Comments, 'Group Four'; on pictorial invocation, pp. 59-61, 66, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 131
  • S 612. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-60, 66, 68 n. 128
  • S 613. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-60, 66, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 128
  • S 614. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 50-3
  • S 615. Comments, Group Two'; on pictorial invocation, pp. 50, 54-6, 64-5, 67 n. 127, 68 nn. 128 & 131
  • S 616. Comments, anomalous witness-list, pp. 62 n. 108, 67 n. 127
  • S 617. Comments, 'Group Three', pp. 57-8
  • S 618. Comments, Group Three'; apparent original, pp. 57-8, 66, 68
  • S 619. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-61, 68 n. 128
  • S 620. Comments, 'Group Four', pp. 59-60, 68 n. 128
  • S 621. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 64-5, p, 68 n. 128
  • S 622. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-6, 65, 68 n. 128
  • S 623. Comments, Group Three'; unlikely to be original, pp. 57-9, 68 nn. 128, 130 & 133
  • S 624. Comments, 'Group Two'; discusses scribe, chrismon, pp. 54-6, 63-5, 67, 68 n. 131
  • S 625. Comments, pp. 33 n. 56, 62 n. 108, 68 n. 128
  • S 626. Comments, p. 62 n. 108
  • S 627. Comments, pp. 52-3, 62 n. 110, 67 n. 127, 'Group One'
  • S 628. Comments, p. 62 n. 108
  • S 629. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 52-3, 62 n. 110, 67 n. 127
  • S 630. Comments, p. 62 nn. 108 & 110
  • S 631. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 52-3, 67 n. 127
  • S 632. Comments, on witness-list, on formulation, pp. 62 n. 108, 68 n. 128
  • S 633. Comments, pp. 49 n. 93, 62 n. 108, 82 n. 165
  • S 634. Comments, 'Group Three', pp. 57-8
  • S 635. Comments, 'Group Two', pp. 54-5, 63-5, 68 n. 128
  • S 636. Comments, 'Group Two'; discusses scribe, chrismon, pp. 20-1, 25, 54-5, 65, 67, 68 n. 131
  • S 637. Comments, 'Group One', pp. 52-3, 63 n. 112, 68
  • S 641. Comments, on formulation, pp. 66 n. 124, 69 n. 134
  • S 643. Comments, on formulation, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 644. Comments, on formulation, p. 62 n. 110
  • S 645. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 125
  • S 646. Comments, probably written by royal scribe, pp. 25, 67, 68 n. 133
  • S 648. Comments, forged, probably at same time as S 360, 370, p. 112 n. 85
  • S 649. Comments, original, pp. 17, 67
  • S 650. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 125
  • S 652. Comments, cited, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 655. Comments, on formulation, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 656. Comments, on formulation, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 658. Comments, spurious, based on S 876, pp. 11 nn. 16 & 17, 27 n. 40, 98-100
  • S 659. Comments, on formulation, pp. 62 n. 108, 67 n. 127, 68 n. 128
  • S 660. Comments, cited, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 661. Comments, certainly spurious;witness-list is 956 'Group Four'; spurious but modelled in part on a genuine 'Dunstan B' charter, pp. 48 n. 89, 59-6, 66, 67 n. 127
  • S 663. Comments, witness-list belongs to 956 'Group Two', pp. 49 n. 93, 54-6, 65
  • S 666. Comments, on the basis of witness-list, classifies as 956 'Group One' diploma, pp. 52-3, 62 n. 110
  • S 667. Comments, diplomatic links with S 677 and 723; possible that same draftsman wrote all three charters, p. 69 nn. 135 & 137
  • S 670. Comments, 'Dunstan B' type, unlikely to be authentic in present form, p. 48 nn. 89 & 90
  • S 672. Comments, forgery modelled on authentic instrument of 956, p. 63
  • S 673. Comments, spurious, based on S 876, pp. 11 nn. 16 & 17, 27 n. 40, 98-100
  • S 674. Comments, compare S 679, example of 'centralized' production in 958, p. 69
  • S 675. Comments, on royal style, p. 69 n. 135
  • S 676. Comments, on charter-type; diplomatic links with S 678, p. 48 n. 85, 69
  • S 677. Comments, apparent original, probably same draftsman as S 667, 723, pp. 28 n. 47, 69-70
  • S 678. Comments, on charter-type; diplomatic links with S 676, pp. 48 n. 85, 69
  • S 679. Comments, compare S 674, example of centralized production, pp. 66 n. 124, 69
  • S 680. Comments, diplomatically close to S 681, probably drafted by 'Edgar A', pp. 75-6
  • S 681. Comments, on royal style; may be early work of 'Edgar A', compare S 680, pp. 69 n. 135, 75-6
  • S 682. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 683. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 684. Comments, apparent original, p. 70 n. 138
  • S 687. Comments, original, product of 'Edgar A', pp. 70-2, 74
  • S 688. Comments, forgery modelled on S 690, pp. 11 nn 16, 17, 72 n. 143
  • S 689. Comments, witness-list perhaps modelled on that of S 690; suspicious, pp. 11 nn. 16 & 17, 74 n. 149
  • S 690. Comments, original, 'Edgar A' formulation, probably work of a royal scribe, pp. 11 nn. 16 & 17, 36 n. 65, 70-3
  • S 692. Comments, influence of 'Æthelstan A' formulation, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 693. Comments, p. 33 n. 54
  • S 694. Comments, may not be authentic, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 696. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 697. Comments, original, compare S 736, pp. 70 n. 138, 76 n. 153
  • S 698. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, p. 73
  • S 700. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 11 n. 16, 73-4
  • S 701. Comments, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 702. Comments, MS 1 not strictly contemporary, p. 70 n. 138
  • S 703. Comments, MS 1 original, written by royal scribe 'Edgar A', pp. 70-3
  • S 706. Comments, original, written by royal scribe 'Edgar A', pp. 70-2, 74
  • S 708. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 11 n. 16, 73-5
  • S 709. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 710. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 711. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, treats as authentic, pp. 73-4
  • S 712. Comments, pp. 27 n. 39, 66 n. 125
  • S 714. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 715. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 51
  • S 716. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 717. Comments, written by royal scribe, pp. 70-2, 74
  • S 718. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 719. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, treats as authentic, pp. 73-5
  • S 720. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-7
  • S 721. Comments, compare formulation of S 697 and cf. S 736, p. 76 n. 153
  • S 722. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 73-4
  • S 723. Comments, on formulation, pp. 69-70 n. 137
  • S 726. Comments, on 'Dunstan B' charters, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 727. Comments, cited, p. 32 n. 51
  • S 729. Comments, probably spurious, p. 72 n. 145
  • S 730. Comments, product of central agency, pp. 27 n. 39, 69 n. 134
  • S 732. Comments, on suspicious formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 733. Comments, on suspicious formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 734. Comments, on suspicious formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 735. Comments, on charter-type, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 736. Comments, original, compare S 697, p. 76 n. 153
  • S 737. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 11 n. 17, 77-9
  • S 738. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 11 n. 17, 77-9
  • S 743. Comments, on formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 744. Comments, renewal of lost landbook, p. 32 n. 53
  • S 745. Comments, can be regarded as work of Æthelwold, p. 81 n. 163
  • S 747. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 748. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 750. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 753. Comments, on 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 754. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 755. Comments, on subscription of diocesan bishop, p. 28 n. 46
  • S 756. Comments, spurious, probably modelled in part on S 876, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 757. Comments, some of the formulae may be derived from S 896, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 758. Comments, some of the formulae may be derived from S 896, p. 11 nn. 16, 17
  • S 759. Comments, some of the formulae may be derived from S 896, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 760. Comments, some of the formulae may be derived from S 896, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 761. Comments, p. 11 nn. 16 & 17
  • S 762. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 764. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 765. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 766. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, proem also in S 762, pp. 77-9
  • S 767. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 769. Comments, witness-list probably from a memorandum of 966, p. 11 n. 17
  • S 771. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 772. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, MS 1 apparent original, pp. 77-8
  • S 773. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 776. Comments, on calculation of regnal year, p. 60 n. 137
  • S 777. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 44 n. 77, 77-8
  • S 778. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 125
  • S 780. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 781. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, probably drafted on the same occasion as S 777 and by the same draftsman, pp. 44 n. 77, 77-8
  • S 782. Comments, on calculation of regnal year, p. 70 n. 137
  • S 785. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 786. Comments, forgery, pp. 98-100
  • S 788. Comments, spurious, pp. 98-100
  • S 789. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 790. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 791. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 89
  • S 794. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 795. Comments, on endorsement, p. 34 n. 58
  • S 800. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 801. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, pp. 77-8
  • S 802. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, p. 48 n. 85
  • S 803. Comments, 'Dunstan B' formulation, pp. 32 n. 53, 48 n. 89
  • S 804. Comments, spurious, p. 89 n. 23
  • S 805. Comments, 'Edgar A' formulation, dates c. 972, pp. 77-8
  • S 811. Comments, suspicious, pp. 32 n. 53, 71 n. 140, 101 n. 52
  • S 812. Comments, spurious, pp. 98-100
  • S 822. Comments, on formulation of proem, p. 44 n. 77
  • S 828. Comments, not authentic but witness-list probably derived from genuine text, p. 84 n. 1
  • S 829. Comments, not authentic as it stands, but witness-list taken from a genuine text, pp. 11 n. 6, 84 n. 1
  • S 830. Comments, closely related to S 832, p. 84 n. 1
  • S 831. Comments, probably authentic, apparently modelled on a diploma of the late 940s, p. 84 n. 1
  • S 832. Comments, closely related to S 830, p. 84 n. 1
  • S 833. Comments, on formulation; spurious, pp. 12 n. 19, 72 n. 143, 268 n. 72
  • S 834. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 6, 238
  • S 835. Comments, authentic, p. 238
  • S 836. Comments, authentic, p. 238
  • S 837. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 6, 238-9
  • S 838. Comments, spurious, pp. 97 n. 43, 101 n. 52, 180 n. 101, 239
  • S 839. Comments, on beneficiary; authentic, pp. 183-4, 240
  • S 840. Comments, authentic, pp. 240-1
  • S 841. Comments, authentic, witness-list printed in K 632 is corrupt, p. 240
  • S 842. Comments, authentic, pp. 92-3, 241
  • S 843. Comments, authentic, p. 242
  • S 844. Comments, authentic, pp. 85-8, 242
  • S 845. Comments, apparently authentic, pp. 92-3, 242
  • S 846. Comments, spurious, date and witness-list perhaps copied in error from S 848, p. 241
  • S 847. Comments, authentic, p. 242
  • S 848. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 114 n. 100, 241
  • S 849. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 85 n. 6, 242
  • S 850. Comments, discusses sanction; authentic, pp. 73 n. 147, 90-1, 170, 243
  • S 851. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 86-8, 120 n. 120, 161 n. 29, 233 n. 10, 242
  • S 852. Comments, authentic, pp. 91, 232 n. 4, 243
  • S 853. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 100 n. 51, 135, 160-1, 243
  • S 854. Comments, spurious, witness-list taken from a charter of c. 1007, pp. 48 n. 89, 94 n. 37, 114, 243-4
  • S 855. Comments, authentic, pp. 85-8, 91 n. 26, 242-3
  • S 856. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 86, 88, 244
  • S 857. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 88 n. 21, 92, 245
  • S 858. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 86, 88, 93, 244
  • S 859. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 88 n. 21, 90, 245
  • S 860. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 88, 93, 244-5
  • S 861. Comments, authentic, land had been expropriated from the see of Winchester, cf. S 891, pp. 39 n. 69, 95, 180, 182, 246
  • S 862. Comments, authentic, witness-list as published in K 654 is corrupt, pp. 48 n. 89, 94-5, 245
  • S 863. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 89-90, 185, 246-7
  • S 864. Comments, original, pp. 89-90, 246
  • S 865. Comments, authentic, pp. 92-4, 247
  • S 866. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 89-90, 247
  • S 867. Comments, pp. 86, 89-90, 246, authentic
  • S 868. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 89 n. 23, 90, 183, 248
  • S 869. Comments, authentic, pp. 92-4, 248
  • S 870. Comments, authentic, pp. 91-2, 93 n. 34, 248-9
  • S 871. Comments, authentic, discusses formulation, cf. S 870, pp. 91-2, 93 n. 34, 249
  • S 872. Comments, authentic, pp. 86, 88 n. 20, 91 n. 29, 92, 249
  • S 873. Comments, spurious, witness-list provides dating limits 996 x 1002, pp. 247-8
  • S 874. Comments, authentic, pp. 85 n. 7, 88 n. 20, 93-4, 250
  • S 875. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 92 n. 32, 132 n. 166, 250
  • S 876. Comments, authentic, MS 1 original, pp. 11 nn 16-17, 27 n. 40, 96, 98-101, 121, 176-7, 250-1
  • S 877. Comments, authentic, pp. 97, 104, 130 n. 158, 201 n. 178, 249, 254
  • S 878. Comments, authentic, MS 1 probably original, pp. 125 n. 135, 133-4, 253-4
  • S 879. Comments, spurious, p. 254
  • S 880. Comments, original, archbishop's contribution may have been limited, overall formulation accords well with that of contemporary diplomas, pp. 100, 111, 124, 135 n. 171, 251
  • S 881. Comments, authentic, p. 251
  • S 882. Comments, authentic, identical witness-list and dating error in S 1379, discusses Bishop Æscwig's contribution in the drafting of these two texts, pp. 124, 251-2
  • S 883. Comments, authentic, pp. 111, 113-14, 253
  • S 884. Comments, original, pp. 96, 120, 253
  • S 885. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 101-2, 121-2, 179, 253
  • S 886. Comments, authentic, pp. 97, 102, 185, 189 n. 123, 253
  • S 887. Comments, authentic, pp. 113 n. 93, 254
  • S 888. Comments, authentic, pp. 102-3, 121-3, 128 n. 142, 254-5
  • S 889. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 102-3, 123, 255
  • S 890. Comments, authentic but possibly a slightly later copy, pp. 120-1, 255
  • S 891. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 101-2, 180, 193, 196, 255
  • S 892. Comments, authentic and original, pp. 104 n. 62, 135 n. 171, 256
  • S 893. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 101, 103, 121-2, 179, 255-6
  • S 894. Comments, spurious, apparently modelled in part on S 895, pp. 122 n. 125, 256
  • S 895. Comments, authentic, p. 256
  • S 896. Comments, authentic, pp. 11 nn. 16 & 17, 27 n. 40, 97, 256
  • S 897. Comments, spurious, pp. 114 n. 99, 161 n. 29, 257
  • S 898. Comments, original, pp. 125 n. 135, 135 n. 171, 257
  • S 899. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 104-7, 133-4, 257
  • S 900. Comments, on formulation; authentic, pp. 107-8, 258
  • S 901. Comments, on formulation; apparently authentic, pp. 107-8, 258-9
  • S 902. Comments, on formulation; apparently authentic, pp. 27 n. 40, 107-8, 259
  • S 903. Comments, on formulation; apparently authentic, pp. 108, 259
  • S 904. Comments, on formulation, compare S 899; on witnesses; apparently authentic, witness-list in K 707 is hopelessly corrupt, much better version in MSS 1, 7, pp. 104-7, 133-4, 258
  • S 905. Comments, may be a contemporary copy; authentic, pp. 33 n. 54, 108 n. 70, 259
  • S 906. Comments, on formulation; on connection with S 920; authentic, MS 1 a later copy, pp. 106-7, 123, 260
  • S 907. Comments, not authentic as it stands, but partly based on contemporary diploma, pp. 114 n. 100, 260
  • S 908. Comments, spurious, witness-list must be imaginary, p. 268
  • S 909. Comments, authentic, pp. 96, 127, 204-5, 260
  • S 910. Comments, authentic, pp. 114, 260
  • S 911. Comments, authentic, pp. 114 n. 103, 260
  • S 912. Comments, on formulation, may be interpolated; apparently authentic, pp. 109-11, 260-1
  • S 913. Comments, abbreviated, authenticity uncertain, pp. 115 n. 110, 261
  • S 914. Comments, spurious, p. 261
  • S 915. Comments, authentic, pp. 112, 114, 126-7, 262-3
  • S 916. Comments, original, may have been drawn up at St Albans, pp. 122-3, 262
  • S 917. Comments, on formulation; may be a forgery, pp. 109-11, 115-16 n. 110, 263
  • S 918. Comments, spurious, possible that a genuine tradition was incorporated in a charter modelled on S 915, pp. 11 n. 16, 27 n. 40, 183 and n. 110, 263
  • S 919. Comments, authentic, pp. 86 n. 15, 263
  • S 920. Comments, on circumstances of production; authentic, pp. 97, 123, 263
  • S 921. Comments, authentic, pp. 125 n. 135, 263
  • S 922. Comments, original, pp. 114, 123, 135 n. 171, 264
  • S 923. Comments, authentic, pp. 114-5, 264-5
  • S 924. Comments, on formulation of witness-list; apparently authentic, pp. 123, 265
  • S 925. Comments, authenticity uncertain, exemption from the common burdens is suspicious but a diploma in favour of the queen may have some unusual features, p. 125 n. 135, 265-6
  • S 926. Comments, apparently authentic, pp. 97, 115, 130 n. 158, 265
  • S 927. Comments, spurious, witness-list not compatible with others of the period, pp. 97, 115 n. 106, 130 n. 158, 201 n. 178, 265
  • S 928. Comments, authenticity uncertain, pp. 44 n. 77, 125 n. 135, 266
  • S 929. Comments, on formulation; authentic, pp. 32 n. 52, 115 n. 106, 125 n. 135, 265
  • S 930. Comments, Burton forgery modelled on S 920, pp. 88 n. 20, 108 nn. 69 & 72, 123 n. 128, 266
  • S 931. Comments, authentic, may have been drawn up by diocesan bishop, pp. 82 n. 165, 124-5, 266
  • S 932. Comments, authentic, pp. 65 n. 120, 266
  • S 933. Comments, authenticity uncertain, cf. links with S 969, pp. 89 n. 23, 97, 115, 267
  • S 934. Comments, authentic, pp. 97, 115, 267
  • S 935. Comments, spurious in received form, elements of witness-list not compatible with date, pp. 97, 267-8
  • S 936. Comments, spurious, p. 268 n. 72
  • S 937. Comments, authenticity uncertain, anomalous but no conclusive objection, pp. 96 n. 42, 111, 256
  • S 938. Comments, spurious, witnesses incompatible, pp. 84 nn. 3 & 4, 268
  • S 939. Comments, pp. 129-30, 148, 161-2, 208 n. 198, 222 n. 244
  • S 940. Comments, spurious in received form, pp. 97 n. 43, 125 n. 135, 262
  • S 941. Comments, spurious, p. 268
  • S 942. Comments, authenticity uncertain, fixes date, pp. 249-50
  • S 943. Comments, authentic, pp. 112, 113-14, 202 n. 182, 261-2
  • S 944. Comments, spurious, p. 250
  • S 946. Comments, dubious, p. 143 n. 209
  • S 947. Comments, on formulation, cf. S 948, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 948. Comments, on formulation, cf. S 947, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 950. Comments, drawn up in ecclesiastical scriptorium, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 951. Comments, on formula, p. 27 n. 43
  • S 953. Comments, Exeter forgery modelled on S 880, pp. 27 n. 41, 100 n. 51, 126 n. 136
  • S 954. Comments, forgery modelled on S 880, cf. S 953, pp. 32 n. 53, 100 n. 51
  • S 960. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 61
  • S 962. Comments, suspicious, pp. 27 n. 41, 126 n. 136
  • S 963. Comments, pp. 27 n. 43, 126 n. 136
  • S 966. Comments, spurious, pp. 140-1 n. 202
  • S 967. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 970. Comments, note on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 971. Comments, pp. 27 n. 43, 36 n. 65, 126 n. 136
  • S 973. Comments, on formulation, p. 66 n. 125
  • S 975. Comments, possibly regional formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 977. Comments, pp. 27 n. 39, 28 n. 46
  • S 979. Comments, possible regional production, cf. S 975, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 980. Comments, dubious, pp. 126 n. 136, 143 n. 212
  • S 983. Comments, pp. 27 n. 39, 28 n. 46
  • S 984. Comments, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 993. Comments, dubious, pp. 11 n. 16, 27 n. 40
  • S 994. Comments, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 995. Comments, spurious, pp. 113 n. 92, 143 n. 212
  • S 998. Comments, pp. 27 n. 41, 126 n. 136
  • S 1000. Comments, spurious, pp. 113 n. 92, 126 n. 136
  • S 1001. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1002. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1005. Comments, on formulation, pp. 33 n. 56, 64 n. 114
  • S 1006. Comments, on formulation, pp. 44 n. 77, 126 n. 136
  • S 1008. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1010. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1014. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 1015. Comments, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1016. Comments, forged on the basis of S 867, cf. also S 804, incorporates passage derived ultimately frm Domesday Book, p. 89 n. 23
  • S 1019. Comments, may be regional product, pp. 27 n. 41, 126 n. 136
  • S 1020. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 1023. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 1025. Comments, on formulation, p. 11 n. 16
  • S 1026. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1028. Comments, cited, p. 26 n. 38
  • S 1031. Comments, on formulation, p. 109 n. 75
  • S 1032. Comments, cited, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1034. Comments, cited, p. 26 n. 38
  • S 1036. Comments, pp. 126 n. 136, 150 n. 233
  • S 1038. Comments, pp. 27 n. 40, 126 n. 136
  • S 1041. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1042. Comments, pp. 26 n. 38, 28 n. 47
  • S 1043. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 29
  • S 1044. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1045. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1046. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1047. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1048. Comments, on formulation, p. 126 n. 136
  • S 1060. Comments, spurious, p. 113 n. 92
  • S 1065. Comments, spurious, p. 143 n. 210
  • S 1066. Comments, spurious, p. 143 n. 210
  • S 1143. Comments, on transaction, p. 144
  • S 1154. Comments, dubious, p. 143 n. 209
  • S 1211. Comments, cited, pp. 33 n. 57, 34 n. 59
  • S 1242. Comments, authentic, pp. 34 n. 59, 138 n. 188, 143 n. 209
  • S 1258. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1291. Comments, on detail of formulation, p. 69 n. 134
  • S 1293. Comments, spurious, note on a witness, p. 179 n. 99
  • S 1378. Comments, spurious, p. 124 n. 132
  • S 1379. Comments, on formulation and relationship with S 882; witness-list must be earlier than 28 Oct. 994 , pp. 124, 252
  • S 1380. Comments, spurious but modelled on authentic document of 990s, witness-list probably from a diploma of 995 x 996, pp. 104 n. 62, 252
  • S 1382. Comments, spurious, p. 128 n. 142
  • S 1383. Comments, may be a contemporary 'file copy' in the Sherborne Pontifical, the original having been sent to the ealdorman, p. 138
  • S 1428. Comments, dubious, p. 143 n. 209
  • S 1429. Comments, cited with reference to legal background, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1436. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1442. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1445. Comments, cited, p. 33 n. 57
  • S 1447. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1454. Comments, pp. 138 n. 186, 187 n. 115
  • S 1456. Comments, pp. 34 n. 59, 137 n. 185
  • S 1457. Comments, cited, p. 34 n. 59
  • S 1485. Comments, pp. 164-5
  • S 1488. Comments, pp. 109 n., 124 n., 225 n., 261
  • S 1492. Comments, p. 121 n. 123
  • S 1497. Comments, p. 187 n. 115
  • S 1503. Comments, dates 1014, p. 267
  • S 1515. Comments, pp. 158-9
  • S 1533. Comments, p. 21 n. 21